A firearm should only be drawn, and fired, to answer a clear and imminent threat of deadly force, not merely to "stop a crime" or because "that guy over there looks scary".
That's my opinion and I'm sticking to it.
Feel free, but you're wrong.
A firearm should only be drawn, and fired, to answer a clear and imminent threat of deadly force, not merely to "stop a crime" or because "that guy over there looks scary".
That's my opinion and I'm sticking to it.
But IF you pulled your gun because a thug with a knife was wanting your wallet, and as you produce the gun the thug turns and runs away before any bullets fly, your still going to shoot?No, I'm not...
As a civilian, my gun stays in the holster until it's time to shoot. There is nothing wrong about that.
I don't need a talisman to wave around every time someone frightens me.
I don't need to draw it, point it, and hope it gets the right reaction.
I also don't need your validation.
No, I'm not...
As a civilian, my gun stays in the holster until it's time to shoot. There is nothing wrong about that.
I don't need a talisman to wave around every time someone frightens me.
I don't need to draw it, point it, and hope it gets the right reaction.
I also don't need your validation.
I agree that the changes are minor (though it does seem to add a little bit of room to prevent a forcible felony, such as detaining Joe Critter before he manages to break open your door), but I think the fact that we've been having this argument here on OSA for as long as I've been here (nearly seven years under this name) shows that we do need the clarification.
Enter your email address to join: