Depends on the agency as well as the proctor. Where I’m at, both as a candidate and an employee, there’s a lot of weight placed on honesty, and any small lie or cover up is considered significant, whereas a lot of past behavior is overlooked if you’re upfront and honest, and it’s clearly in the past and not still a practice. For a long time, however, there were a couple different proctors and guys who had been denied in the past by one were passed by the other later on. They all reported aggressive interrogation techniques and unethical questioning by the same proctor, and I think the process has been modified now to alleviate that, or at least to not use that proctor.