Question for Conservatives

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Joined
Jan 12, 2007
Messages
30,016
Reaction score
17,621
Location
Collinsville
Why do you raise Hell about Obama's birth certificate, but are mute on Romney's refusal to release his tax returns?

Classic double standard. So much for fairness. Carry on.

I actually think he SHOULD release 10 years worth. I just think he should expose the double standard that the liberals and media have, by tying his release to the release of that information the Obama team refused to release all these years. I think Obama has FAR more hidden that Romney.
 

Lone Wolf '49

Sharpshooter
Special Hen
Joined
Jan 18, 2008
Messages
3,132
Reaction score
8
Location
Oklahoma City
All I can say about this, is that obummer has spent over 4 million dollars in legal fees to keep his and his wifes college transcripts, funding, etc.
If Mitt has to show tax returns, because he is hiding something(which he isn't.) then obummer has to respond with unsealing his college transcripts.
We KNOW obummer is hiding something.
Sounds fair to me.



I still wonder how a high school boy from indonesia got into the finest schools in the ivy league. Who paid for it?
Was he a foreign exchange student? Is that what he is hiding?

Thank you. I really try to stay out of the political BS but why not disclose something so simple and yet people who went to the same universities never knew him? Just sayin', and as Edward R. Murrow said: Good night and good luck.
 

TerryMiller

Sharpshooter
Special Hen
Joined
Jun 4, 2009
Messages
19,898
Reaction score
20,753
Location
Here, but occasionally There.
Oh, what the heck. I might as well chime in here.

First of all, read the quote in my signature line about voting based on one criteria.

In one sense, Obama has been a blessing (but mostly a curse to the normal folks.) He and his administration and the Democrats in Obama's first two years put into effect just about everything that the Left has said would be great for this country. What Obama didn't get done in those first two years, he's put some into effect with executive orders.

However, in spite of all the "good" that was supposed to come about because of liberal beliefs, they have pretty much all been proven to be false. As I predicted elsewhere, the liberals are now out there saying that the reason the Stimulus didn't work was because they "just didn't spend enough." (That quote is a familiar refrain.)

The "blessing" is that now the left has been proven wrong with regards to the Keynesian philosophy of economics and that in spite of all they tried to do, all we have for it is more government debt. So, as another question, why don't you lefties give us a dollar number of how much it will take to "fix" things.

For those interested, look into Obama's executive orders. I know of at least two times that he has stated that he would "work around Congress."

As for Carter, one of his actions was to start the ball rolling that ended up with the sub-prime loan collapse. His administration created the law that saw to it that people who couldn't afford them were given home loans. So, "No" to the question as to whether Carter was a pretty good president. We also had fuel rationing then as well.
 

Latest posts

Top Bottom