Supporting a background check for private transactions is disgusting.
Absolutely right.
I will never support that.
Supporting a background check for private transactions is disgusting.
I'm watching the Senate judiciary committee hearings on guns on cspan right now. While talking about the UBC legislation that they are currently working on in the Senate, Sen Schumer just addressed gun registration . Specifically he said "it won't create any gun registry. That is already illegal and it will be repeated as illegal in our law."
If that is the case, I'm going to have a hard time finding a reason to not support it. I know there is already a thread asking if you would support ubc with no registry. So my question is, if they propose UBCs and specifically prohibit a gun registry, what are we to be afraid of?
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I317 using Tapatalk 2
So how long after the sale do the FFLs destroy their records?
20 years, see below para 4.One FFL told me that the law was 10 years... but that he never destroyed them. I'd like to think that if the law is 10 years, then after 11 or 12, my FFL would destroy the records. Kinda trying to keep a statute of limitations on the "registry being held by the FFLs"
That said, what do you FFL guys say. Is there a time limit to which you are required by law to keep the 4473's around?
Enter your email address to join: