I’m guessing that the ammo for Leo only doesn’t have the Pittman-Robertson tax implemented on it.
Why wouldn't non-leo want either one? I've read many reports of people having to fire through their windshields or barriers in the home. I certainly would want the critical duty ammo to penetrate a sheet rock wall in the home against an intruder that thought that gave them cover.
I actually called colt about this question, it was to put as many semi auto rifles in the hand of LEOs, at a greatly reduced rate. And the stamp was basically an attempt to keep LEOs from flipping them for a considerable profit, their was no law( at least okie law), the LEO came with (3)- hi cap mags.Another member and I were conversing about the restricted roll marks on the LE 69XX series yet anyone can own one.
They are on regular Colt AR semiautomatic rifles and carbines. None have the capability of full automatic fire.
I do understand the restriction of the rifle itself in several commie states because it is black and shoots bullets in Commiefornia.
There has to be a simple answer.
Basically, the 1994 assault weapons ban killed colt profits, the LEO market gave it a kick start.The only thing I can think of is the manufacturers get something for marking these products LE only.
Tax write off?
Well, I actually watched the full link for the record. I don't keep mouse guns in the home full size only which is why my response was tailored the way it was.Well, if you read the information in the link it would explain why. I didn't say they wouldn't want either one. I said it might not be the best choice for the average person for self-defense.
The Critical Duty is made for full-size guns with longer barrels. It'll work in smaller guns...but it isn't optimized for them. The Critical Defense ammo is optimized specifically for shorter-barreled guns the average armed citizen probably carries. The link explains all that.
Basically, the 1994 assault weapons ban killed colt profits, the LEO market gave it a kick start.
Enter your email address to join: