Their narrative is only cover for, and driven by, their agenda.
I like that they are loosing ground, but they certainly don't like it! Hence, the shrinking bale of straw. This amounts to nothing more than an act of desperation.
If what they claim about this bill is unconstitutional, why didn't they argue against the bill for its supposed unconstitutionality while it was being heard in the legislature, or sitting on the governor's desk waiting to be signed, or as soon as it passed? Obviously, there is nothing to their claim. Is there anything in the bill that doesn't concern the bearing of arms? I haven't seen any such thing. This doesn't even amount to a half decomposed, trampled upon, manure-covered stubble left over from last years harvest.
Woody
The point being they are three leftist states and they are Constitutional carry. The only marginal one might be, again might be New Hampshire. But all three have leftist tendencies, I know because I lived up there long enough to know first hand.
Appears to be registered Republican
https://voterrecords.com/voter/37455159/joseph-andrews
And his wife is a registered Democrat.
https://voterrecords.com/voter/37455160/mollie-andrews
Last edited:
Lemmie guess......one went to OU and the other went to OSU.
Which means he's a 'moderate'. IOW, he leans left.
It's going to go into effect on Nov 1st.
The AG is arguing this case himself.
