I'm still concerned about the 'apparent' ambiguity about carrying in a place where alcohol is consumed vs primary purpose is alcohol consumption... didn't the new law include the wording about consumption? If he got arrested for carrying in a place like Chili's where they SERVE it, but he wasn't consuming himself or in a bar specifically, I'd be real concerned. Even though I think the guy is a tool of the highest order...
There is nothing ambiguous about it. It is VERY CLEAR: No SDA permit? You can't carry ANYWHERE that serves alcohol. I am really surprised it took this long to arrest him. The 51% rule has nothing to do with it.
Again, this is yet ANOTHER reason I cringe when I hear people call permitless carry "Constitutional Carry"...because guess what?!?! IT ISN'T!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!