Or, to use slightly less inflammatory language,
Parker v. D.C., 478 F.3d 370, 395 (D.C. Cir. 2007) aff'd sub nom. D.C. v. Heller, 554 U.S. 570, 128 S. Ct. 2783, 171 L. Ed. 2d 637 (2008)
Ladies and gentlemen, the language of the Court.
To summarize, we conclude that the Second Amendment protects an individual right to keep and bear arms. That right existed prior to the formation of the new government under the Constitution and was premised on the private use of arms for activities such as hunting and self-defense, the latter being understood as resistance to either private lawlessness or the depredations of a tyrannical government (or a threat from abroad).
(Emphasis added.)
Parker v. D.C., 478 F.3d 370, 395 (D.C. Cir. 2007) aff'd sub nom. D.C. v. Heller, 554 U.S. 570, 128 S. Ct. 2783, 171 L. Ed. 2d 637 (2008)
Ladies and gentlemen, the language of the Court.