- Joined
- May 14, 2020
- Messages
- 8,720
- Reaction score
- 27,739
Why continue to waste bandwidth on this unreasonable knucklehead?
Because the principles about which he is arguing are important to a free society?Why continue to waste bandwidth on this unreasonable knucklehead?
Because the principles about which he is arguing are important to a free society?
Thanks for your permission.True... And an internet forum is exactly the place to solve those sorts of problems. Carry on then...
You LITERALLY misrepresented everything he posted. Your circumlocutions aren’t going to change the fact that you’re obstinate and obfuscatory.It is exactly his fundamental argument. Merely to gainsay is not refutation. Show how I misstated his argument.
His stubbornness taps out beyond running his suck.That’s not what I’m saying. I was simply replying to your questions and gave you facts in regards to what you asked. 4th is unreasonable search is seizure. Nothing about that stop was unreasonable and was lawful. Again, courts have made rulings that show a vehicle is an exception. An exception doesn’t take away the 4th, it just gives it more details in certain areas of the 4th. Your sons rights weren’t violated. He was searched and seized legally.
Go get you a lawyer instead of arguing on an online forum in what you feel is right based on your definitions of what you read. There’s a whole lot of case law that rebuttals your thoughts.
You LITERALLY misrepresented everything he posted. Your circumlocutions aren’t going to change the fact that you’re obstinate and obfuscatory.
His stubbornness taps put beyond running his suck.
Enter your email address to join: