Warrantless search - Rogers County

[tweetr]

Live it Love it you need a Woman!!!

I have one, thanks! A good one! 21 years today.

 

[Bocephus123]

get her a get out of jail free card.. might need it!

 

[tweetr]

get her a get out of jail free card.. might need it!

Great idea! Send me a blank one and I'll fill it in, thanks.

 

[Bocephus123]

Great idea! Send me a blank one and I'll fill it in, thanks.

On the Way!

 

[Chuckie]

I have one, thanks! A good one! 21 years today.

21 years today huh? If that were me I'd be accused of 'robbin' the cradle' - just saying

 

[Oklahomabassin]

Rogers County Deputies Find $2.5M Worth Of Drugs During Traffic Stop

Deputies said they found 115 pounds of meth and more than two pounds of fentanyl in the trunk of a Tyra Stewart’s car, which they believe came straight from the cartel.

www.newson6.com

 

[Aries]

Rogers County Deputies Find $2.5M Worth Of Drugs During Traffic Stop

Deputies said they found 115 pounds of meth and more than two pounds of fentanyl in the trunk of a Tyra Stewart’s car, which they believe came straight from the cartel.

www.newson6.com

The part of this story that makes me happiest is that somebody FINALLY got pulled over for tailgating!!

(no, no I'm just joking)

 

[bubbaturbo]

I love the passive voice there (and in your previous, similar post.)
"It has been explained to you."
Oh! It has been explained to me! Well that changes everything! Obviously I no longer can disagree once "it has been explained!" I even replied, "Good info?" Of course I did. I appreciate the input whether or not I agree. I am courteous, even in disagreement, unlike some people here. The inherent transferrence is entertaining too. "Butthurt" is a particularly inarticulate adjective with respect to a Fourth Amendment objection; but is reasonably apt to describe someone upset that I don't agree with a hazily supported opinion on legal estoterica. You don't know me. Why do you care, emotionally care, whether I agree?

You shouldn't argue with me, you know. I graduated first in my class at Harvard Law, though I declined the JD, so you won't find any record that I was there. After graduation I clerked for Antonin Scalia. I actually wrote most of his decisions for him; he just signed his name. (Only the decisions you find brilliant; not, obviously, the ones with which you disagree.) Because I wrote them anonymously you won't find any attribution. I taught Constitutional law for years, so obviously my opinion is more weighty than yours. Once I have explained it to you, you no longer have any grounds to disagree.

Now. Does my claiming any of that make it so? Is gratuitous assertion valid argumentation?

As you evidently do care whether I agree (and I cannot conceive why), then a word of caution: the moment you appeal rudely ad hominem I simply no longer care what you think. I operate generally on the assumption that an intelligent, or even a merely thoughtful man can construct his argument courteously. If he cannot then that impeaches the quality of his argument. Just FYI.

OMG what? Lol.

 

[kingfish]

Just couldn't let this thread die eh?

 

[JEVapa]

We can make it to 60