Did you adjust parallax on the scope when you shot at that longer distance.
And did you adjust it and move your eye position side to side and up and down slightly while looking through the scope and make absolutely sure it was set spot on?
I am sure you probably did but just mentioning it.
My scopes with Parallax settings are not marked where they should be.
100 yard mark is never exactly parallax free at 100 I have to "fine tune" it.
It is the 2nd thing I check, right after elevation.
I have found that as a general rule, the parallax tends to be closer to the correct indicator marks on the dial as scope prices increase...not always exact, but pretty close.
I think that I might have been the victim of running a smaller sample size. Sometimes we luck out and everything accidentally falls into place for one group. Literally .2gr above and below that load were ~.8 MOA...so I'm going to assume that is a fairly wide window of about a half grain where I can get repeatable sub-MOA performance out of a semi-auto. That brings my sample size to (4) 5-shot groups instead of one...with a "lucky" .5 MOA one in there.
I learned my lesson with single groups about 20 years ago when I shot a .289" three-shot group during load development for a .308. I got so excited like a little circus boy that I went home and loaded 100 of that recipe...only to discover that the load was a consistent ~ MOA shooter .