Assault Rifle vs. Sporting Rifle - Video

[imasoonerfan]

http://youtu.be/8C-CLsMRcA0

[video=youtube_share;8C-CLsMRcA0]http://youtu.be/8C-CLsMRcA0[/video]

 

[71buickfreak]

This is what I have been telling people. There is no point in banning +10 mags, it takes less than a second to change mags.

 

[ez bake]

very good video.

 

[HMFIC]

Really good video.

 

[Perplexed]

Wish it was captioned. What was the gist of his argument as to the differences between the two rifles?

 

[ez bake]

Wish it was captioned. What was the gist of his argument as to the differences between the two rifles?

He goes over (very clearly) the fact that black plastic furniture, a pistol-grip, and a collapsable stock don't make an "assault rifle" and demonstrates with an AR-15 and a real M4 - the difference in rate-of-fire (something I hear getting confused all the time by antis lately). He also says "Assault rifles have already been banned in 1986" and gives a link to the Hughes act (he states that older machine-guns have been grandfathered and that the new ban doesn't even allow for that).

He then goes over the difference in shooting at two targets with 20rds in a mag and then with two mags - each loaded with 10rds (it's about half a second).

 

[Perplexed]

Thanks. I look forward to the day that the Youtube captioning feature does an accurate job transcribing the script. An attempt like "A$$ salt full banded ate six" makes for some amusing reading, but it's not particularly informative.

 

[henschman]

Call them whatever you want, but the ones I own are certainly not for sporting purposes.

 

[backspur]

Call them whatever you want, but the ones I own are certainly not for sporting purposes.

These sound like words from a man who knows very well what he is about.

 

[ripnbst]

Heres another one