I've smoked weed and I have had a stroke.
The correlation is there!
The correlation is there!
Way stronger, is what I hear.What's different about today's weed? I'm not up to date on the weeds.
Higher “octane” levels … much of which is stronger.What's different about today's weed? I'm not up to date on the weeds.
No possibly about it—the whole “study” was BS.Yep. Possibly a flawed study.
I watched the video but didn’t read the study.No possibly about it—the whole “study” was BS.
IDGAF about weed, but I can’t abide junk science.
Aint nobody got no time for no video.So…none of you actually watched the video?
I see. If the act of smoking is harmful, isn't it better to have higher potency for the desired effect?Higher “octane” levels … much of which is stronger.
“Better”? I would guess that dope smoking losers would want a more efficient buzz. That said, the stronger, higher potency weed amplifies the issues that are harmful which is not “better”.I see. If the act of smoking is harmful, isn't it better to have higher potency for the desired effect?
As one who used it for years, from the 60's, (but no longer) the main difference)s) are that todays are generally more standardized as to content, but certainly weaker than the best (Panama Red, Acapulco Gold, Thai, Columbian Black, etc. It also contains a lot more chemicals that the stuff that was grown in the earth. Those cant be good for you.What's different about today's weed? I'm not up to date on the weeds.
Enter your email address to join: