So you think making the ghostbusters female "broadened their appeal", arguably the biggest flop made in the last 30 years.
Lol. Who said it had to be a good idea or even successful? Lots of things aren’t, but that doesn’t require the level of pearl clutching that seems to go on for stuff like this.So you think making the ghostbusters female "broadened their appeal", arguably the biggest flop made in the last 30 years.
I haven't seen it myself, but what I have heard is that although it wasn't one continuous shot, it was exceptionally well edited to make it look like one continuous shot. It sounds like they did pretty well on that front.1917 was way too slow. Can’t believe it is so highly rated. The cool thing is it’s shot all in one continuous take.
Lol. Who said it had to be a good idea or even successful? Lots of things aren’t, but that doesn’t require the level of pearl clutching that seems to go on for stuff like this.
and since you asked, it grosses ~$229 million on a $144m budget. Hardly Waterworld (which was something like $264 box office on an eventual $235 outlay in 1995).
O, the irony...What is funny is every time someone has an opinion about anything other that the way you think they are "pearl clutchers". Get over your self, people are allowed to have differing opinions! It would be a sad sad world if everyone were in lock step with... you!
explain the irony.O, the irony...
Complaining about someone with a differing opinion by stating that people are allowed to have different opinions doesn't strike you as more than a bit ironic?explain the irony.
Enter your email address to join: