Found On Drudge.

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.

HMFIC

Sharpshooter
Special Hen
Joined
May 4, 2009
Messages
11,193
Reaction score
11
Location
Tulsa
I was wondering when this was going to start...

The question now will be what is the definition of someone who isn't mentally fit to own a firearm according to the laws already on the books. I can only assume they will be trying to uncover every nook and cranny to ensure as many people fall into that category as possible.
 

R. Johnson

Sharpshooter
Special Hen
Joined
Jan 25, 2010
Messages
521
Reaction score
3
Location
Norman
I'm waiting to pass judgement on this until I have some more info. All that says is that if the VA adjucates you mentally unfit that you can't own firearms. Should that be a red flag? Yes, of course. However is the same not true of anyone deemed mentally unfit by a doctor? Yes we do need to know what the criteria are, however that photo was not of an actual letter sent to a veteran barring them from firearm ownership, but of a paragraph from a manual describing a law. I'm not saying that there haven't been any veterans who have been unjustly deemed unfit, but this article doesn't give any examples, nor have I heard of any either. That said, I believe we should remain highly suspicious, but we need more info too.
 

SoonerP226

Sharpshooter
Special Hen
Joined
Jan 1, 2013
Messages
14,504
Reaction score
16,089
Location
Norman
However is the same not true of anyone deemed mentally unfit by a doctor?
If you're talking about the Federal disqualifications, no. You have to be adjudicated as "mentally defective"--in other words, the court has to declare you mentally unfit, not (just) a doctor.

Also, I thought they passed a law a few years ago to prevent this from happening (I'm pretty sure Coburn was a co-sponsor). Or did it not get signed into law?
 

mugsy

Sharpshooter
Supporting Member
Special Hen Supporter
Joined
May 20, 2011
Messages
4,538
Reaction score
1,112
Location
South West, OK
I think the key issue is one of due process - we generally agree that someone can be declared mentally unfit to own a weapon (or even be on the streets) the real sticking point is what is the process and when does the "accused" get to have a hearing before a judge? And what is the appeal process? A "determination" by some bureaucrat, or even a doctor, without a full open hearing or review seems patently unconstitutional.
 

Latest posts

Top Bottom