This From me....but do you mind if I change it to.........."B" pulls his weapon and shoots "A" from the ground after being assaulted..
I would say both were "bad shoots"
This From me....but do you mind if I change it to.........."B" pulls his weapon and shoots "A" from the ground after being assaulted..
I would say both were "bad shoots"
Only thing I know is that the anti-gunners would have a field day with it. I can see the headlines now,
"Shootout at the OK corral"
Two Oklahoma men at a party where alcohol was being served got into an argument. Both men had a license to carry a concealed firearm. Both men drew their guns and started blasting away.
You can imagine the rest from there.
"Shootout at the OK corral"
Two Oklahoma men at a party where alcohol was being served got into an argument. Both men had a license to carry a concealed firearm. Both men drew their guns and started blasting away.
You can imagine the rest from there.
I agree. Once the first part had unfolded though I say it was a good shoot IF he could not have ran or escaped in some manor.
Bad shoot.
Bad shoot, because you put yourself in a situation where a Jury (made up of God knows who) might have to decide your future.
A good shoot is when your innocence is so obvious that the DA wouldn't even think about prosecuting.
A good shoot is when your innocence is so obvious that the DA wouldn't even think about prosecuting.
I'm voting bad shoot.
Agreed...bad shoot. you started the fight.
It sounds like it was Mutual Combat and B lost then drew his gun and really lost this time. BUT both should have walked away when things started getting out of hand and lived another day.
Similar threads
