So r u saying a majority of people that have lung cancer got it from smoking pot?
I don't think this is a complete thought so I'll let you reword it. The last is just a ******** analogy.
Gov. Stitt declares Oklahoma special election for recreational marijuana vote
- Thread starter NationalMatch
- Start Date
So r u saying a majority of people that have lung cancer got it from smoking pot?
I don't think this is a complete thought so I'll let you reword it. The last is just a ******** analogy.
heeeeere i gooooo
**(please note i reply to comments, not users, and i speak from a general pov. even if i clearly agree with your comment, i may speak to the reader who does NOT agree, which makes some of ya'll old boomers have a really hard time following the shifting pov. i assure you, it's quite simple when you realize there are lots of people who read these posts and never bother even making accounts):
you accept this? we did it. we killed over a million muslims and the blood of every single overdose is on the hands of us citizens and the entire medical industry. now tell me how weed is evil.
for instance: if you are willing to claim that a 30 year old person who has been smoking pot for 16 years smoked a few hits before his commute to work and HIS REACTION TIMES are impaired to the point of not being allowed to legally travel unmolested, would you like to willingly volunteer YOUR reaction times at age 65 as a comparison?
(i don't know your age, just making a point. i'm taking a 30 year old stoner's reaction times over an old person EVERY DAY, and if we open this can of worms that is "muh judgement and reaction time" you DON'T want to go down that slope, i assure you, because you'll find that YOU are probably worse off than a young stoner.)
but even blood level isn't a direct way to determine "impairedness" on any particular scale. look at say how the NFL treats concussion protocols. they have a series of tests for EACH individual player and they recreate these simple tests after a head injury. they compare the results to the baseline and determine impairedness on a scale of standard deviations away from the baseline.
you *could* argue this is purpose of field sobriety tests, but we know that's not the case given the power dynamic of ya know....someone being allowed to legally detain/murder you.
abc7ny.com
since you threw it out there and i kinda like numbers and trying to make people realize just how completely asinine their arguments are, let's crunch some super basic numbers. and let's be real; ya'll don't do NEARLY enough thought experiments, and you should! especially with your age, it's great for brain plasticity!
assume a 35 year old weed partaker:
* $60 of weed per month (in the old days, you'd get an ounce of the dirtiest mexican red swag (more on this in the next quote!) for this price and that would last a month for a single user easily. not a random figure, i assure you)
smoking
* been smoking since 17
that's 216 months of $60 weed costs. that comes to:
$12,960.00
for **18 years of weed usage**
and the beauty is, with legal weed, it's *much, much cheaper* for a *much, much better product*.
so your $60 a month costs have actually gone way down. if people are doing home grows, just a plant or two, your costs eventually come out to be pennies on the dollar per year.
a SINGLE YEAR of raising a child in the US?
$18,271
most people I know that smoke weed believe it or not DON'T really drink or smoke cigarettes. you might say the weed is enough, as many of them as soon as they don't have weed will say "dang, maybe i need a beer".
PLUS, and this will change, but without the social aspect of alcohol, you're never going to be in a position wherein you realize you spent like WAY more money than you should have on a weekend out.
like honestly, how many of you have gone out for cocktails and ended up with a tab hitting triple digits? for a weekend? easy. that NEVER happens with weed, despite what you may think. there's no situation wherein "oh crap....i bought like two rounds for the whole bar didn't i?"
you are 100% correct the "weed today is nothing like it was decades ago" and I ASSURE YOU that's definitely all for the better. no offense, but you were smoking disgusting weed grown by *actual mexican cartels* that was grown in federal parks or south of the border and smuggled in gas tanks after being spray with potpourri. we all know it. anyone who ever even *saw* brick weed back in the day knows it.
you don't even know what that stuff WAS man.
you're telling me you wouldn't want a cleaner product that was either grown BY YOU or someone you know or AT THE VERY LEAST someone in your state?
(yes i understand they are likely chinese, but i'm fairly sure those farms are probably growing the cheaper low end stuff. I really don't know, but i would bet the fancy rich people farms are growing some high end stuff that gets a much higher profit margin).
no one wants to smoke red brick weed that smelled like gas, that crumbled into dust like the Ten Commandments in Raiders of the Lost Arc, that had stems the size of tree branches, that was grown and sold by people actually committing actual violent crimes, and the worst part *didn't even get you high* EVER again.
>it's not the same weed we all smoked!
yeah that's why you think stoners are dumb and lazy and ********. you smoked things you had idea where it even came from and assume everyone else is doing the same.
**(please note i reply to comments, not users, and i speak from a general pov. even if i clearly agree with your comment, i may speak to the reader who does NOT agree, which makes some of ya'll old boomers have a really hard time following the shifting pov. i assure you, it's quite simple when you realize there are lots of people who read these posts and never bother even making accounts):
yes it is. a plant the US government spent 20 years locking down literally and *then i'm sure by COMPLETE CHANCE* the US medical industries (you know the same ones making the (not)vaccines?) put synthetic opioids on the market that led to billions in profit and more dead from drug overdoses than any point in US history. like....significantly more dead. and they got caught doing this and paid a bunch of fines, but way less than they made.
you accept this? we did it. we killed over a million muslims and the blood of every single overdose is on the hands of us citizens and the entire medical industry. now tell me how weed is evil.
judgement and reaction time *being effected* is an extremely general statement that does nothing to counter the argument that it's simply not comparable to alcohol. there are countless things that effect judgement and reaction time while driving, and i DARE NOT mention the most heavily correlating factor: age. (second is distraction)
for instance: if you are willing to claim that a 30 year old person who has been smoking pot for 16 years smoked a few hits before his commute to work and HIS REACTION TIMES are impaired to the point of not being allowed to legally travel unmolested, would you like to willingly volunteer YOUR reaction times at age 65 as a comparison?
(i don't know your age, just making a point. i'm taking a 30 year old stoner's reaction times over an old person EVERY DAY, and if we open this can of worms that is "muh judgement and reaction time" you DON'T want to go down that slope, i assure you, because you'll find that YOU are probably worse off than a young stoner.)
to be honest, there's *no real way* to determine is someone is impaired *on anything*. that's why police are allowed to just arrest you and detain you illegally until someone can draw your blood.
but even blood level isn't a direct way to determine "impairedness" on any particular scale. look at say how the NFL treats concussion protocols. they have a series of tests for EACH individual player and they recreate these simple tests after a head injury. they compare the results to the baseline and determine impairedness on a scale of standard deviations away from the baseline.
you *could* argue this is purpose of field sobriety tests, but we know that's not the case given the power dynamic of ya know....someone being allowed to legally detain/murder you.
ah yes, because *everyone i know who is childless* spends $18,000 a year on beer, cigarettes, and weed.
New study finds it costs over $18,000 a year to raise child in the US
A new study found it costs $18,271 per year to raise a child due to inflation.
since you threw it out there and i kinda like numbers and trying to make people realize just how completely asinine their arguments are, let's crunch some super basic numbers. and let's be real; ya'll don't do NEARLY enough thought experiments, and you should! especially with your age, it's great for brain plasticity!
assume a 35 year old weed partaker:
* $60 of weed per month (in the old days, you'd get an ounce of the dirtiest mexican red swag (more on this in the next quote!) for this price and that would last a month for a single user easily. not a random figure, i assure you)
smoking
* been smoking since 17
that's 216 months of $60 weed costs. that comes to:
$12,960.00
for **18 years of weed usage**
and the beauty is, with legal weed, it's *much, much cheaper* for a *much, much better product*.
so your $60 a month costs have actually gone way down. if people are doing home grows, just a plant or two, your costs eventually come out to be pennies on the dollar per year.
a SINGLE YEAR of raising a child in the US?
$18,271
most people I know that smoke weed believe it or not DON'T really drink or smoke cigarettes. you might say the weed is enough, as many of them as soon as they don't have weed will say "dang, maybe i need a beer".
PLUS, and this will change, but without the social aspect of alcohol, you're never going to be in a position wherein you realize you spent like WAY more money than you should have on a weekend out.
like honestly, how many of you have gone out for cocktails and ended up with a tab hitting triple digits? for a weekend? easy. that NEVER happens with weed, despite what you may think. there's no situation wherein "oh crap....i bought like two rounds for the whole bar didn't i?"
now THIS is the most absurd take of them all.All about choices and freedom and the weed today is nothing like it was years or decades ago.
Pull up a chair and read this.
Instead of a link I copied and will paste it.
Ok just a link.
you are 100% correct the "weed today is nothing like it was decades ago" and I ASSURE YOU that's definitely all for the better. no offense, but you were smoking disgusting weed grown by *actual mexican cartels* that was grown in federal parks or south of the border and smuggled in gas tanks after being spray with potpourri. we all know it. anyone who ever even *saw* brick weed back in the day knows it.
you don't even know what that stuff WAS man.
you're telling me you wouldn't want a cleaner product that was either grown BY YOU or someone you know or AT THE VERY LEAST someone in your state?
(yes i understand they are likely chinese, but i'm fairly sure those farms are probably growing the cheaper low end stuff. I really don't know, but i would bet the fancy rich people farms are growing some high end stuff that gets a much higher profit margin).
no one wants to smoke red brick weed that smelled like gas, that crumbled into dust like the Ten Commandments in Raiders of the Lost Arc, that had stems the size of tree branches, that was grown and sold by people actually committing actual violent crimes, and the worst part *didn't even get you high* EVER again.
>it's not the same weed we all smoked!
yeah that's why you think stoners are dumb and lazy and ********. you smoked things you had idea where it even came from and assume everyone else is doing the same.
Since “PTSD” wasn’t a medical term until the early 80’s, I’m guessing this isn’t a real advertisement
Easy peasy--have Stitt declare March 6 & 7, 2023 as "Oklahoma Get Stoned Days" and all the stoners will stay away from the polls and get stoned. Then only intelligent people will vote....
It wouldve been easier to just have the vote on April 20th, hahaha.
At a 10% tax rate that's $1296, which should go directly into the schools and the "weed fund" which goes to help said families and hard drug addicts. I just made up that sh*t but it sounds good.
That's a pretty broad assumption that "stoners" aren't intelligent and won't vote coz they're high. I bet that not only will they vote, they are probably smarter and more successful than the "intelligent" people you're referring to.
Might could be, however ol Doc Icepick was the real deal.
I wonder why Stitt did this? And I completely disagree, I'd rather see free education in Oklahoma to 2 year colleges. An education helps people to do better in life as a rule plus, they'll make more money and pay more taxes. That is a win-win situation, those obtaining an education have a better life and those on welfare will benefit from more taxation, they won't run out of money like Social Security. (sarcasm)
I have read where smoking MJ will adversely affect the lungs. But everyone has to decide how they live....
Smoking Weed: 10 Effects of Marijuana on Your Body
I have read where smoking MJ will adversely affect the lungs. But everyone has to decide how they live....
Smoking Weed: 10 Effects of Marijuana on Your Body
Last edited:
He put a lot of things on earth that are harmful also for a reason, Stinging Nettle, Poison Ivy, Fleas, Ticks, etc. That doesn't mean we have to have a use for them-no offense intended, just commenting.
It depends on the education...there are only so many Mickey Ds jobs for psych majors. Besides, what you're asking is leaning way over in the socialist playground.
I know something - how about affordable tuition and books? Affordable school instead of making it an unaffordable corporate sh*thole? The only people who can go to most schools are rich kids (who tend to be generally little commies), Foreigners, and some minorities but that's it. Everyone else pays in body parts and livelihoods damn near for what? Colleges are businesses now and only the folks with the right money can go shopping. It's BS.
Last edited:
Similar threads
Latest posts
-
[4Sale] Preban Polytech double folder 386 factory nib complete AA grade unfired- Latest: Rustytweezers
-
[4Sale] Preban Polytech 9396 AK47 75 round drums. 7.62x39 new
- Latest: Rustytweezers
-
[4Sale] FS WW2 Soviet PPSH-41 Drums. These hold 72rds of 7.62x25.
- Latest: Rustytweezers
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-