And the SCOTUS has never gotten anything wrong right? How many rulings have they allowed to stand that trample on our 2A? If you use speech to incite fear, panic or to knowingly cause emotional distress, that is a terroristic behavior and SHOULD be illegal. And more to the point that type of behavior does not belong in society. The founders put the 1A to protect citizens free speech against a tyrannical government. Had they known how it would be interrupted later on I'm pretty sure they would have reworded it. It goes back to the saying "The freedom of me to swing my fist ends right before it hits your nose". In other words our rights exist until they are used to cause harm to another.
So you are ok with people prank calling 911, or swatting other people? This useless bundle of flesh took it upon himself to cause the police to come out with the simple goal of causing a scene. Why? To advocate the 2A? No. He did it for attention, pure and simple. Those that are advocates for the 2A do so in a manner that is constructive and does NOT induce fear into the public. The AR already has enough people against it, do you think causing people to see it and fear it is a good way to win over those who haven't formed an opinion yet?
I will say my comparing them to WBC was a stretch, I wasn't fully awake when I typed that. However, to draw this to a close, these people (and I use the term loosely) are nothing but attention seekers. They don't care about the 2A. To them its just a way to get the attention they think they deserve. If they were serious about getting the public used to seeing these AR pistols they would do so in a way that doesn't cause fear. Right now the 2A is in a PR battle. The left are telling the populace that these guns are scary and violent. Most of us are trying to fight that PR with facts but yahoos like this go out and provide the fodder for more lefties to push for bans. The SCOTUS has already ruled several times that certain restrictions on the 2A are allowed even with the constitution plainly states "shall not be infringed". They even allowed the first AW ban to go through. These yahoos are paving the road to another ban, they are even using top grade asphalt to make sure the road is nice and smooth.
I don't know why you're still arguing with that clown.
That's either Richard Hubbard, or a friend of his, so trying to educate him about what was done was a very stupid thing and hurts gun rights more than it helps it, is just pissing in the wind.