Low cost 3-D metal printer

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.

aviator41

Sharpshooter
Joined
Jun 7, 2013
Messages
5,004
Reaction score
115
Location
Edmond/Guthrie
I think low cost is based on a commercial model, not consumer. The article says they hope to produce near net products that "only" require 3 or 5 axis machining to achieve final form.

While this is a great breakthrough for the commercial industry, allowing for quick one-off or custom parts, the technology to produce useable parts or items with a comparable tensile and compressive strengths to current production is still a long way off.
 

71buickfreak

Sharpshooter
Special Hen
Joined
Jul 22, 2009
Messages
4,790
Reaction score
30
Location
stillwater
I think low cost is based on a commercial model, not consumer. The article says they hope to produce near net products that "only" require 3 or 5 axis machining to achieve final form.

While this is a great breakthrough for the commercial industry, allowing for quick one-off or custom parts, the technology to produce useable parts or items with a comparable tensile and compressive strengths to current production is still a long way off.

That is not exactly accurate. GM and Ford have machines that are capable of producing useable parts now. in metal. A couple hundred K gets you some really cool stuff.
 

aviator41

Sharpshooter
Joined
Jun 7, 2013
Messages
5,004
Reaction score
115
Location
Edmond/Guthrie
Yes, actually it is accurate. Even GM and Ford state the their 3D metal parts are only good enough for testing and evaluation. They use the technology for prototyping and custom one-off parts, but are generally considered not suitable for use in production of end product.

They do have 3D printers for casting parts, but they are not directly generated using the printers. the printers are used to create parts using a process similar to lost wax casting.

What makes the process in the article different is the method by which the metal is fused together, making parts that have properties closer to a forged part, not cast.
 

doctorjj

Sharpshooter
Special Hen
Joined
Apr 16, 2009
Messages
7,041
Reaction score
1,178
Location
Pryor
Yes, actually it is accurate. Even GM and Ford state the their 3D metal parts are only good enough for testing and evaluation. They use the technology for prototyping and custom one-off parts, but are generally considered not suitable for use in production of end product.

They do have 3D printers for casting parts, but they are not directly generated using the printers. the printers are used to create parts using a process similar to lost wax casting.

What makes the process in the article different is the method by which the metal is fused together, making parts that have properties closer to a forged part, not cast.

In the aerospace industry they are making production parts using 3D printing. It is happening now. It's not "a long ways off".
 

aviator41

Sharpshooter
Joined
Jun 7, 2013
Messages
5,004
Reaction score
115
Location
Edmond/Guthrie
In the aerospace industry they are making production parts using 3D printing. It is happening now. It's not "a long ways off".

Yes, there are 3D printed parts in the aerospace industry. One popular way to do this is FDM or Fused Deposition Modeling for composites. Nasa is currently testing rocket engine parts generated using 3D metallic printing.

Get obscure enough and you can find printed diamonds.

The OP's original post was about economical 3D metal printing. There are very few areas of Aerospace where using the adjective "economical" would be accurate. Being able to make 3D printed parts out of metal economically is still a very long way off. It took years before carbon fibre was able to move into mainstream and be considered economical. One of the first places carbon fibre appeared was Aerospace. Aerospace/defense pioneers many technologies.
 

Latest posts

Top Bottom