Have any of you guys ran into this gem of an argument in favor of magazine restrictions? "If you can't hit a bad guy with 7 or 8 rounds, you shouldn't own a gun in the first place."
I guess these people have never seen or thought of an instance where there is more than one attacker or a drug crazed perp that doesn't respond to multiple hits from a handgun.
The example that immediately pops in my head is that woman in GA that shot an intruder in the face 5 times with a .38 and the guy lived. Can you imagine if that guy had an accomplice? I promise you she would have liked to have as many rounds on hand as possible. As a matter of fact even without an accomplice, I'd bet after her revolver went click and that guy was still alive and kicking, she wished she had more capacity at that moment.
Just can't believe some people have enough brain power to breath when they come at you with an argument that weak. No ability to comprehend unforeseen circumstances.
I guess these people have never seen or thought of an instance where there is more than one attacker or a drug crazed perp that doesn't respond to multiple hits from a handgun.
The example that immediately pops in my head is that woman in GA that shot an intruder in the face 5 times with a .38 and the guy lived. Can you imagine if that guy had an accomplice? I promise you she would have liked to have as many rounds on hand as possible. As a matter of fact even without an accomplice, I'd bet after her revolver went click and that guy was still alive and kicking, she wished she had more capacity at that moment.
Just can't believe some people have enough brain power to breath when they come at you with an argument that weak. No ability to comprehend unforeseen circumstances.