here we go all of the teenage girls jumping onboard to socially discredit my argument.Dammit you whities quit bothering a guy. He doesn't need your approval or need to answer your questions on his %. Racist bastages
here we go all of the teenage girls jumping onboard to socially discredit my argument.Dammit you whities quit bothering a guy. He doesn't need your approval or need to answer your questions on his %. Racist bastages
here we go all of the teenage girls jumping onboard to socially discredit my argument.
the term "indian" was never intended to be offensive, it merely identified us as a people. However for the next 500 years Europeans attempted to commit genocide against us or destroy every part of our culture. When people, other than Indians, decided to take the next step and convince Indians they were not even an individual culture, but part of a larger America, it was one more step towards destroying our identity.
lastly, Indian would be either, depending on context. attempting to cause confusion is used for the same rest as above. However, "injun" is extremely offensive, the same using the "n" word towards a black, which several of the mods and owner of this forum believe is fine.
here we go all of the teenage girls jumping onboard to socially discredit my argument.
Dang. Seriously man, I don't think anybody here is trying to discredit anything, or offer any disrespect to either you or your heritage, but man you sure do seem awful sensitive about this whole thing. You know something? It's not my fault that Europeans attempted to commit genocide against Indians or "destroy your culture". And I think you're stretching it to say that some people here thinks the use of racist terms like injun or the N word is fine. But hey, if that's your view, well, I guess you can have it. Sad though that you seem so angry. You're honestly starting to sound like Dennis's buddy Ace here man. How about I suggest a book called "The Broken Spears: The Aztec Account of the Conquest of Mexico " by Miguel Leon-Portilla. It talks about the early history of the Americas from a different perspective, from the perspective of Indians. What I'm saying is that most history is written by the "winner". Or"1491: New Revelations of the Americas Before Columbus" by Charles C. Mann. Very insightful look at pre-Colombian America and the social structure of the inhabitants at that time. I'll mention one more for you off my shelf: "The Columbian Exchange: Biological and Cultural Consequences of 1492" by Alfred W. Crosby. That one is an eye opener!
Back in ancient history, when I was in grade school, we used to celebrate Columbus Day. Wonder why we don't anymore? Could it possibly be because we now seem to recognize that Columbus didn't actually "discover" anything but was instead, just a lost pirate facing imminent mutiny from a disgruntled crew? Was he just a poor seaman who accidentally instituted a change in the course of history by inadvertently stumbling onto land? Sure did lead to the flood of European invaders though huh? Sorry about that, but again, it's not my fault so lighten up okay?
I never called you anything but if the shoe fits.Waaaaaaa! You called me a whitie, and a racist bastage...next thing I know you will be calling me an old retired guy.
I never called you anything but if the shoe fits.
You know, when you defend someone else's racial view points and attempt to discredit someone to prove your friends are correct, you have the shoes on and and breaking them in.Not you, that bassage jwryan. And get this: the shoe doesn't fit.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
You know, when you defend someone else's racial view points and attempt to discredit someone to prove your friends are correct, you have the shoes on and and breaking them in.
Enter your email address to join: