I think the stressing for an explanation is strictly in response to Cue's apparent assumption that the OP was acting in a pompous manner by exercising his right to OC.
I think the stressing for an explanation is strictly in response to Cue's apparent assumption that the OP was acting in a pompous manner by exercising his right to OC.
Except that the manager in question, didn't do that.
lol, whatev.
Now, go eat your lunch outside behind the dumpster.
Sorry to disappoint you Buzzgun, he is my personal valet and needs my express written consent to redundantly answer your question.
I therefore do not give him consent, due to its serious insignificance.
Seriously though, whats your problem? I posted what he meant, he agreed. If thats not good enough he will buy you some talc to rub on your heiny.
Why are you so focused on my question about Cue's opinion??
I'm tired of hearing people say "I support the second amendment.....................BUT".............followed by "reasons" why they think other people shouldn't exercise that right, as they choose!!!
You either believe it, or you don't!
As for the original discussion, well, Cue opened the door to a side track when he basically accused the original poster of "pompous open carry".
Sorry, but I want to hear it from him, especially answers to the second part on the question, you know, the part about how he knows which is which by just looking.
One more time, let him speak for himself.
Wow we just need to whip out post counts and see who has the biggest
OK! I'll whup it out!
And won't we feel silly when we get whooped by BB?Wow we just need to whip out post counts and see who has the biggest
Similar threads
