Forcing a new healthcare tax on the Titanic is a pretty accurate description.
The difference between Obama and Romney is that Romney would be a first term President. I would rather have the guy still trying to get re-elected than the guy who has nothing lose in pursuing his extreme left-wing agenda. Our choices are unfortunate but they have been for a long time now.
Your voting for who?
It works like this, people run for public office, people vote. Its a right.
See if 2 politicians run and they are exactly alike except for party affilliation, thats not statistism. Even if it goes on for decades.
If 2 parties rise to power and and share ideals and political philosophys, you might have an argument.
But thats not the case. The 2 parties are about equally divided, and slug it out with only temporary gains and losses.
Like you said its been an experiment for 236 yrs. Our Govt, by its design and nature evolves, thats why we vote, thats why it really doesnt matter who the person is that runs, as long as we vote.
I see my critics are trying to silence me. It won't work. Obama for the loss unless he comes up more FREE stuff for the voter goodie bags.
A small businessman voting for 0bama is like a Jew voting for Hitler.
This is well put...
This is well put...
SirROFL said:
That is a whole lot of truth for 3:06AM.
No, it's not. This is an incredibly disrespectful analogy.
Paul or Gary Johnson or no one. I will not support a Democratic Statist or a Republican Statist. I won't even vote for Inhofe.
statism (from Merriam-Webster): concentration of economic controls and planning in the hands of a highly centralized government often extending to government ownership of industry
Both parties typically support economic controls in a centralized government.
This makes no sense. It does matter who runs. If we are given two horrible choices by a terrible two-party system, it does matter. The Republicans are devoted to promoting a conservative moral and social agenda by wrongly using the federal government's power (hence the attack on gay marriage and abortion from a federal level) and strengthening the military industrial complex. The Democrats are devoted to promoting a collectivist economic model and expanding federal powers openly. Both support the War on Drugs and various federal education programs, which is far beyond the reach of the federal government.
We need to have more choices! A third party candidate can't even get on the ballot in Oklahoma!
Slugger, i get your point, and understand what a statist is. Generally speaking the parties are similar and Generally speaking it doesnt matter who runs for office, if they belong to either party the differences are negliable.
A third party on a Oklahoma ballot would be great, but thats not the case.
If a person excersizes a right to vote and only has 2 choices from 2 parties, that hardly warrants an accuzation of being a statist. (not that you accused anyone)
Btw, im with you against Inhofe and Colburn, both need to be replaced.
A third party on a Oklahoma ballot would be great, but thats not the case.
If a person excersizes a right to vote and only has 2 choices from 2 parties, that hardly warrants an accuzation of being a statist. (not that you accused anyone)
Btw, im with you against Inhofe and Colburn, both need to be replaced.
Similar threads
