Are you kidding, it didn't need fixing. Your "The underline in part A made it seem as if this was authorized by the SDA as opposed to the license be authorized." doesn't make sense.. section #6 is authorized by the SDA .. a license is not required.
A natural reading of the posted text was self explanatory as it came straight from the new law. All I did was 'highlight' that business owners, home owners and renters would be able to carry loaded handguns, rifles and shotguns on property they controlled... without the need of a permit... which should be of great interest to all business & home owners. You shouldn't be nitpicking people's posts.
No, section 6 is not authorized as part of the SDA. This part of the law is 1289.6 which does not fall under the SDA (1290.1 - 1290.25). 1289 says you can do all of these things listed below without a license from the SDA.
I wasn't trying to nitpick your post, but upon first reading, it seemed as if it was saying (because of the underline in part A) that these things were authorized by the SDA which they are not.