Oh come on. A speeding ticket is more concrete than this nonsense.
Cohen "did under a federal candidates direction". That's legalese for said candidate having an active retainer with him. Doesn't mean the "candidate" knew a damn thing about it. Like I said he screwed himself. And does anybody else think it odd that he turned 180 degrees with his statement and that Lanny Davis is his counsel? Things that make you gooo hmmmmm....
you could be right, or you could be wrong. It's a pretty ambiguous statement.
And did you see some of the statements Lanny Davis was making last night?
A Post article about it (sorry, gotta get the kid ready for school and can't find an AP article easily)
One possible answer came into view the very same day, as Cohen’s attorney, Lanny Davis, suggested on television — and in an interview with The Washington Post late Tuesday — that Cohen had knowledge “of interest” to special counsel Robert S. Mueller III and that his client was “more than happy to tell the special counsel all that he knows.”
Davis said that Cohen’s knowledge reached beyond “the obvious possibility of a conspiracy to collude” and included also the question of Trump’s participation in a “criminal conspiracy” to hack into the emails of Democratic officials during the 2016 election.
On “The Rachel Maddow Show,” Davis, who is a veteran of the Clinton White House, said his client had “knowledge about the computer crime of hacking and whether or not Mr. Trump knew ahead of time about that crime and even cheered it on.”
But kudos for the correct use of counsel.
And no, pleading to (or being convicted of) a federal crime is not less 'concrete' than a speeding ticket. The implications might not be what people on the left want them to be, but make no mistake, these were crimes (even if other people were doing them too).