Well I could have seen a heavy incentive driven 10 year 200-220 max, but good grief 250 is absolutely off the charts. And to the Angels no less. Now I got to root against the guy.
I will enjoy the talking heads discussing why even with Pujols the Rangers win the AL west. View attachment 18431
Statistically, easy answer. Pujols provides less of an upgrade for a larger contract with the Angels, than they could have gotten improving problem positions for them. They need another 6-8 WAR* or so out of their roster to provide the theoretical jump required to pass the rangers through simulations. They'll still be in need of 3-5 more WAR depending on how Albert produces, provided the Rangers don't go batshit on themselves and screw everything up.
My boys will watch from the basement again
![Frown :( :(](/images/smilies/frown.png)
*rough estimate from what I remember, I'd have to check for actual numbers.