And to further the mess... for years this WAS Clark County public land the Bundys paid county fees on for years. BLM took it in a land grab. Thats the prelude.
Yeah, I'm not thinking of any particular sheriff. Making a comment directed at all those who think state and county control/authority is the end-all, be-all of liberty. Seems to me the state and county authorities in this case are pretty much worthless.
If the state owns the land and they disagree with the BLM management of it, state authorities should be standing up.
And to further the mess... for years this WAS Clark County public land the Bundys paid county fees on for years. BLM took it in a land grab. Thats the prelude.
So, in regards to this case, who actually owns the property? The State of Nevada, with administration and oversight of the BLM?
If it is state land, have any of Bundy's legal cases been heard in State court? If not, I'm switching sides to "BLM can go pound sand" and "Team Bundy".
Where's the almighty County Sheriff that so many seem to get all erect about?
Keep in mind, it's not the federal government claiming the turtles are the reason, it's Bundy making that claim.I'm wondering who the hell owns it now too. Just saw Hannity on the tube say that "it's not BLM land" and the way the feds got involved were the turtles which has been pretty much debunked. Not the validity of the court orders mind you, just the pretext that the turtles still need protection has been debunked. I'm wondering if you are right and the county/state did farm out administration to BLM. Is BLM charged with enforcement of the Endangered Species Act?
Bundy said his family has been working the land in Clark County since before Nevada was granted statehood. He said that the federal government has no right to own land that rests within a sovereign state based on the constitution.
“It’s really about our constitutional rights and statehood,” he said. “And whether this area known as the state of Nevada is owned by the United States government or is owned by the sovereign state of Nevada.”
Despite Bundy’s claim that the federal government has no right to charge fees to land that is owned by the state of Nevada, BLM Public Affairs Specialist said that the U.S. government unequivocally owns public lands, and that Bundy is subject to two federal court orders to remove his cattle from said lands.
She said that Bundy is in violation of both orders, and that he left the BLM no choice, but to confiscate the estimated 908 head of cattle.
“The United States government owns and has broad authority to regulate federal lands in Nevada,” Cannon said. “In response to challenges of federal ownership of the lands in Nevada, the 9th circuit held that the federal government owned all federal lands in Nevada, and that those lands did not pass to the state upon statehood.”
http://www.kcsg.com/view/full_story...ally-Owns-The-Land-?instance=more_local_news1
Almost sounds like a sovereign citizens like claim to me.
Nevada has had emminent domain inflicted so many times its on speed dial.BLM took it, or the state authorities let them administer it in exchange for ????
I agree.That's all well and good, if BLM actually owns it....
Enter your email address to join: