The original statement I was addressing did not include the issue of violence, it referenced thieves should be shot. It also referenced looting but looting is not always violent so since it's my question lets stick to the issue of thievery and his opinion that thieves should be shot and go from there.
In his original statement, he was specifically addressing looters and violent mobs:
The looters in Ferguson / New Orleans (Katrina) and any other happening. A riot / mob knowing LE will use deadly force will be a deterrent. What part of stealing a TV coincides with conducting a demonstration?
I hate thrives, YES shoot them like the rabid dog they are.
Yes, he hates thieves and he may even wish them all shot. However, that was not the gist of his post and you knew it when you selectively targeted one word in his post. Therefore my questioning of your reductio ad absurdum debate tactic here is valid. So let's not stick to your question unless you want me to continue pointing out the flaw in your argument.
Factors, evidence and standards??? Youve been around, you know how this plays out.
We've all seen this same situation play out a hundred times. Evidence, Standards, circumstances, its always the same. White Cop shoots unarmed black man in black neighborhood. Public protests. Bla bla bla.....
Same scenario, same result, same outcome. Unarmed black man dead.
So what's the lesson learned?
CNN is running the killer whale show, MSNBC is Lockup Raw Fox is the Kelly file. Its dark, almost 10pm, why aint nobody covering this?
Perhaps because we've all seen this same situation play out a hundred times?
This. There are probably a few hundred agitators out of a population of more than 20,000...so saying They, Them, and Those people is too broad.
At some point, the other 19,000+ residents need to get fed up and help bring back order (and I actually think most of them are already at that point, but the media is trying their best to paint this as a larger uprising).
One can't help but wonder, if the worst 10% of the few hundred out of 20,000 were culled from the mob, what would happen to the crime rate in that community over the next year?
Im not so sure this is ready to end. Placating or appeasing those citizens who were protesting, then being attacked/intimidated by local police. I think the marches and protest should continue.....even to the point of provacation.
I really think those local officials/Govt, Mayor/Council/Police Chief and Police Dept should be suspended and terminated. Put city govt into trusteeship until order and public trust is regained.
Perhaps we should deputize some of these fine upstanding citizens that are "protesting" for a change? They could call themselves "Regulators" and right all the wrongs!