Several bills move forward in state legislature

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.

NikatKimber

Sharpshooter
Staff Member
Special Hen Moderator
Joined
Jan 2, 2006
Messages
20,793
Reaction score
1,520
Location
Claremore
I think it's a step in the right direction. It's slightly easing the requirement, which hopefully will be followed by even more easing.

It's a small, pinky-toe, crawl in the right direction. In that the non elected employee can set policy as a group, or individually.

It's a step backwards in that now they can """"officially"""" set no-guns policies. They could already do that; all they had to do was say: carry allowed, please bring CCW license to office for official permit letter.

My main gripe, is a non-elected, public employee / company, gets to set firearms policies.

That part of the law needs to be stricken entirely. Either make it law that we can, or law that we can't. Even "may-issue" permits from the local Sheriff are less offensive: there is public recourse against the Sheriff.
 

Latest posts

Top Bottom