I don't, but my wife does. Apparently they even built up to the story. My wife called me into the bedroom to ask about it before the story came on so I was in there to see it. And it was all about Sonic, I don't even think they mentioned Chilli's.
Sent from my LG-E980 using Tapatalk
I know I would feel safer if I could bring this bad boy into a Chili's.
I am just guessing, but I think they may be going for the headlines. While they are in pro-gun areas, they don't exactly rake the business in from what I see driving by. If I had to make a wild-ass guess, their thought process is "Let's lump ourselves in with restaurants with more mass appeal (the coordinated Chili's/Sonic press releases) and make a stance that while absolutely meaningless (differing to state laws for vehicle carry, at a vehicle only for all intensive purposes) will gather us lots of headlines, and with any luck anti-gun people will support our "stance" in droves". I would bet there will be no signs posted, they know the anti-gun community will see and herald this decision, and almost no one else will (if you didn't see it on here, do you think you would have ever seen it?).
Intensive purposes lol
Enter your email address to join: