Trump pardoned former sheriff Joe Arpaio

[Oklahomabassin]

Has anybody checked out the new gen 5 Glocks?
I remember when OSA was primarily about gun/ammo/shooting discussion with some classifieds and a little headline news.

 

[Annie]

Has anybody checked out the new gen 5 Glocks?
I remember when OSA was primarily about gun/ammo/shooting discussion with some classifieds and a little headline news.

Lmao! Yeah ... right ...

 

[D. Hargrove]

Has anybody checked out the new gen 5 Glocks?
I remember when OSA was primarily about gun/ammo/shooting discussion with some classifieds and a little headline news.

Yeppers, here is the thread link:
https://www.okshooters.com/threads/gen-5-glocks-at-big-boys.248077/

 

[Oklahomabassin]

Yeppers, here is the thread link:
https://www.okshooters.com/threads/gen-5-glocks-at-big-boys.248077/

Sorry I didn't use the sarcasm font.

 

[Chuckie]

According to the attached URL (https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/8/1325) illegal immigration IS a Federal offense as well as a civil one, unless I'm reading this incorrectly. If so, then former Sheriff Joe may be guilty of crimes like illegal detention of US citizens, but not detention or arrest of illegal aliens.

 

[D. Hargrove]

Sorry I didn't use the sarcasm font.

Neither did I, my bad...lol

 

[Oklahomabassin]

Neither did I, my bad...lol

I don't think you can pull the sarcasm excuse, you provided a link. Oh well. Smh

 

[Dave70968]

According to the attached URL (https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/8/1325) illegal immigration IS a Federal offense as well as a civil one, unless I'm reading this incorrectly. If so, then former Sheriff Joe may be guilty of crimes like illegal detention of US citizens, but not detention or arrest of illegal aliens.

Improper time or place is civil; marriage fraud and entrepreneurship fraud are criminal.

 

[D. Hargrove]

I don't think you can pull the sarcasm excuse, you provided a link. Oh well. Smh

Levity, it was levity...

 

[Glocktogo]

You are correct in that the Administrative Agencies can delegate some authority, but that's at their discretion. It's not up to the state/local level to subsume that authority on its own--hence the quote in the order that “states do not have the inherent authority....” There's no violation of the Supremacy Clause if fed.gov passes a law pursuant to the Constitution allowing delegation (which would include the Administrative Procedures Act, giving subdelegation authority to the original delegate, the administrative agency). That just seemed like too esoteric an argument even for me, but yes, you're entirely correct.

I include it simply because Maricopa Co. did in fact have a 287(g) MOA in effect, which was then rescinded by Janet Napolitano in 2011 after the DoJ report was released. Maricopa Co. didn't subsume it, they simply refused to stop what they'd already been trained and certified to do when the MOA was pulled.

http://www.phoenixnewtimes.com/news...ls-because-of-civil-rights-violations-6631025

287(g) is ramping back up under Trump, but I doubt if MCSO will be a participant this time around, even with Arpaio gone.

http://www.npr.org/2017/03/09/51928...-police-to-help-ice-agents-gets-mixed-reviews