Your diatribe of the military putting biden in office is blatantly wrong. Trump requested 10,000 National Guard Troops prior to Jan 6.
Nancy Pelosi is in charge of capitol security and denied the request.
Work on that one which is the truth.
Your diatribe of the military putting biden in office is blatantly wrong. Trump requested 10,000 National Guard Troops prior to Jan 6.
Nancy Pelosi is in charge of capitol security and denied the request.
Work on that one which is the truth.
I have always thought that Nancy knew they had operatives in place whose mission was to rile up the crowd.
Almost guarantee this is what happened.
Wow. I just read all 12 pages of this thread and it's just, wow...
They presented geotracking data and videos of the actual ballot box stuffing......wearing blue rubber gloves then dumping the gloves in adjacent trash bins.
My question is where did all of the ballots come from anyway? Are they watermarked like have some kind of imprint embedded in the paper?
Did a warehouse have extra leftover boxes of unfilled ballots? How could you fill all of those out in the entirety? I know when I voted, there were boxes and boxes of ballots and we waited in line for 2 hours to vote.. The lines were crazy long. Something I have never seen before in all my voting years.
Did a warehouse have extra leftover boxes of unfilled ballots? How could you fill all of those out in the entirety? I know when I voted, there were boxes and boxes of ballots and we waited in line for 2 hours to vote.. The lines were crazy long. Something I have never seen before in all my voting years.
there were plenty of videos taken by poll observers showing mail bags FROM CHINA delivering ballots.
i'm not saying that's "proof" of voter fraud.
but again, first time that ballots were sent to every voter; rather than requested.
and also had to have the same amount as USUAL of normal ballots available on election day.
so yes, clearly that's a higher than normal number of ballots.
then you get into all the videos and news articles (most of them were reported on) about entire dumpsters and rented trucks being full of unfilled out ballots and there's obviously even more.
kinda like that vaxx, at a time when everything *else* is extremely hard to come by, a vaxx that required special containers, special trucks, and special licensing to transport was so wildly available our government gave out billions of doses to other countries.
there's a chance the scheme even involved bringing in the ballots, unfilled, opening them, then when all the counting places just stopped counting, taking the unfilled ballots out, filling them, then just simply returning them via van at 4 am.
this lines up with video evidence. i'm not saying this occurred, but i'm saying there's definitely a CHANCE that's exactly how it was done. there is NO chain of custody for those ballots once opened and removed from envelope.
and WE KNOW from hima's testimony (if anyone bothered to watch it....) that she observed MULTIPLE stacks of absentee ballots there were ORDERED BY NUMBER, which makes no sense if they were MAILED IN. it would make sense if the ordered number of ballots were opened, then filled out, then brought in to be tabulated. possibly multiple times, also observed by hima and others and noted on video.
so i'm saying the ballots being delivered into the boxes in some cases might have even been unfilled. they could be opened at the counting site, no one would be able to see that were unfilled ballots, then just merely filled on either on site (again, i mean....they kicked everyone out and put up cardboard pizza boxes on the windows....they could have done ANYTHING) or taken out, filled, and returned in the cover of darkness (which we know ballots WERE delivered to multiple counting stations at 3-4 am, this happened at multiple sites in multiple states). if you had a team of vote counters who knew EXACTLY what to do with the blank ballots, it'd be a very easy scam.
I was talking about a different subject with @joegrizzy. I did watch this and find it compelling, I now wonder if they have enough evidence to actually move forward with bringing this to light. Time will tell. What I find interesting is there are not a bunch of folks pouncing all over this and debunking what has been shown.
I mentioned this a year or more ago. Just think of the target one would put on their back. Look at what the justices are having to endure now because of the RVW leak. The actual beginning of a ‘real’ investigation with proof (that the MSM won’t show anyway) would rain havoc on a federal judge that began the process.
I had this conversation with a lib at work the other day. His response was the 60+ lawsuits that have been brought with judges all ruling that there’s not enough evidence. I think they are afraid for their safety, either through common sense or coercion.
I had this conversation with a lib at work the other day. His response was the 60+ lawsuits that have been brought with judges all ruling that there’s not enough evidence. I think they are afraid for their safety, either through common sense or coercion.
there's no bringing anything to light.
>we don't want the mobs outside our house
we all know this
not enough evidence means
>we don't want the mobs outside our house
we all know this
