It's pretty simple to build a pistol first. Put the stock tube on the lower and call it a pistol.
Who will ever know how it originated to begin with other than the builder?
This all seems like mental masturbation that has no happy ending.
Tell me how that would happen. Is the serial number part of the phone call and paper work to the ATF? I dont think so?Probably no one ever will, but we are discussing the legality, not probablity. The only scenario I can think of is you buy a stripped lower from someone on the board that you think is new, but is actually a receiver from a rifle they stripped down. You make it into a pistol, get bored with it and sell it. That guy then uses it in a crime, ATF runs it and finds out it was originally a rifle. Perp says he bought it from you as a pistol and you get charged with an NFA violation. Sure it is far-fetched, but I can tell you what happened to a friend of mine going thru a nasty divorce several years and the soon to be ex-wife called ATF on him.
Tell me how that would happen. Is the serial number part of the phone call and paper work to the ATF? I dont think so?
I've been looking into building a AR pistol also, and just trying to figure legalities. From what I understand the ATF has also given permission to run the Magpul AFG on a AR pistol correct?
Yes, more stupid logic. A VFG on a pistol is a no-go, but an AFG is ok. Go figure.
Enter your email address to join: