Another reason I trust him.
http://www.coburn.senate.gov/public...&File_id=04c65665-f913-4edc-9e63-09ad10a47eca
http://www.coburn.senate.gov/public...&File_id=04c65665-f913-4edc-9e63-09ad10a47eca
Still no reason for him to vote for it. It passed with a good sized buffer.
This is my thinking too. If we know its bad why give it a chance to pass, why vote for it at all? Couldn't it backfire & actually make it's way through now that it's at this point? What happens if the Republican votes they are counting on fail to uphold their end & it passes?
I don't believe any new legislation that further restricts our 2A rights should be brought to debate. Shame on all who voted to put our rights up for debate.
You stop it with your logic and reason. There's no place for that kind of crap around here; Coburn is obviously a witch, and must be burned at the stake. Or do we dunk witches? Maybe we're supposed to pillory him. I forget.The debate phase of the process is where the merits, and even the Constitutionality, of legislation can, and are intended to be, discussed. Not every issue is clearly defined, so it's a little hard to pre-judge every piece of legislation and not even allow it to the floor for debate.
His "yes" vote simply lets the bill come forward to be seen in the light of day, it's not a vote of support for the bill itelf. It also allows the final votes for or against the bill to be seen and be a permanent part of the voting record of every Senator.
Enter your email address to join: