But you do know that pretty much every domestic murder starts off as a man who just used to hit his wife occasionally and then eventually escalates from there.
And how does that compare to those incidents that don't escalate?
Any why only men?
But you do know that pretty much every domestic murder starts off as a man who just used to hit his wife occasionally and then eventually escalates from there.
But you do know that pretty much every domestic murder starts off as a man who just used to hit his wife occasionally and then eventually escalates from there
There is (obviously) no way that I can respectfully engage in this conversation so I'm walking away.
Well, I'll assume that you're being facetious with that last statement - unnecessary but I can deal. So -let me ask you: What on earth would make you think that just because someone hits someone, they will shoot them next time? Did you EVER hit your brother or sister growing up? In fact, have you ever hit anyone, ever, in anger? If yes, then answer this: If there had been a gun available at that moment, would you have shot them instead? Your answers to those questions, if you answer them, will either tell you all you need to know about the correct result here, or tell us all we need to know about your projection issues.
Another question for you: Look at Veggie Meat's picture thingy: Would you be OK with a lifelong BAN on you being able to protect yourself as depicted from a drunk violent abusive man, just because you hit him previously in self-defense when he was slapping you around, and he lied to the police and said you hit him unprovoked, but you were found guilty of a misdemeanor because he ended up with a bruise (evidence), and you did not (no evidence)? You're ok with that?
And how does that compare to those incidents that don't escalate?
Any why only men?
True. And every car accident that causes death begins with someone who just occasionally speeds and drives erratically and gets away with it, and then eventually escalates from there. Therefore, anyone who speeds should have his or her driver's license permanently revoked for the rest of the their lives - CORRECT? (and driving is not even a RIGHT mind you, like the RKBA).
If you get caught speeding too often they do take your license away. And if you get busted for DUI you get your license revoked as well. .... the same basic principles apply.
I physically prevented my ex from hitting me a 3rd time, never punched her just got hold of her and tossed her out of the way so I could leave the house with out having to escalate my response any higher than a simple trap and arm bar. We didn't have a phone, I went to the corner to call the police I wanted her and her crap out or I wanted her gone so I could pack my crap and be gone.
I had the black eye and split lip, she didn't have a mark on her, when she screamed DV because I stopped her from bashing my face in with ball bat because I wanted no part of a physical confrontation guess who wound up in handcuffs?
I have no use for a wife beater but I disagree with DV being an excuse to remove your second amendment rights because of my situation.
When the police were finally willing to listen to me, they realized I was the victim (like a couple of morons they beat me to the house, heard her side of the story and wouldn't let me inform them of my permit or pistol before ordering me down on the ground and then they cuffed me without frisking me and had a holy hell we screwed up moment when I finally could get them to listen to me)
Of course when I said I wanted to press charges I got the poor woman just wants to get her stuff and go to her mothers sob story she told them, from them and they didn't file the charges.
Enter your email address to join: