HB 3354 - Open Carry

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.

rwillis

Sharpshooter
Special Hen
Joined
Aug 20, 2007
Messages
133
Reaction score
0
Location
SW OK
Charles Ortega said:
A Motion to Reconsider means that the author has three legislative days to bring the bill back up and have it voted on again. If the bill is not brought back up again, it will continue on in the process: enrollment and then being signed or vetoed by the Governor.

This is the email i got yesterday from Rep Charles Ortega

So it is not on Henry's desk YET
 
Joined
Dec 9, 2008
Messages
87,580
Reaction score
69,732
Location
Ponca City Ok
I hope the Gov see's the light. Its a shame he is term limited now, so he can vote the way he want too.
Will I go to walleyworld in OC.....no, and never will. Will never OC in any circumstance other on my home or while hunting, no. But I will defend the right of those that want to.
I just hope that we all maintain some sense of decorum and remember that even though its our right, we keep in mind others peoples feelings.
We all need to be responsible gun owners, and that involves keeping other citizens that may be on the fence of pro gun or anti gun owners in our minds.
It would bother me to see some parent grab their kids and run for the parking lot with some gun owner toting a hog leg into wallyworld. That is not what this law is about.
 

1shot(bob)

Sharpshooter
Special Hen
Joined
May 6, 2007
Messages
2,132
Reaction score
0
Location
Broken Arrow
I hope the Gov see's the light. Its a shame he is term limited now, so he can vote the way he want too.
Will I go to walleyworld in OC.....no, and never will. Will never OC in any circumstance other on my home or while hunting, no. But I will defend the right of those that want to.
I just hope that we all maintain some sense of decorum and remember that even though its our right, we keep in mind others peoples feelings.
We all need to be responsible gun owners, and that involves keeping other citizens that may be on the fence of pro gun or anti gun owners in our minds.
It would bother me to see some parent grab their kids and run for the parking lot with some gun owner toting a hog leg into wallyworld. That is not what this law is about.

Pray tell, what is this law about then?
 

reddog1

Sharpshooter
Special Hen
Joined
Apr 1, 2009
Messages
11,599
Reaction score
187
Location
FEMA Reigion 6 Broken Arrow
I hope the Gov see's the light. Its a shame he is term limited now, so he can vote the way he want too.
Will I go to walleyworld in OC.....no, and never will. Will never OC in any circumstance other on my home or while hunting, no. But I will defend the right of those that want to.
I just hope that we all maintain some sense of decorum and remember that even though its our right, we keep in mind others peoples feelings.
We all need to be responsible gun owners, and that involves keeping other citizens that may be on the fence of pro gun or anti gun owners in our minds.
It would bother me to see some parent grab their kids and run for the parking lot with some gun owner toting a hog leg into wallyworld. That is not what this law is about.


NOOOOO... think about it... everyone leaves... NO lines, AND ya got the store ALL to yerself...

LMAO, You all know I'm kidding right?
 

Danny

Sharpshooter
Special Hen
Joined
Feb 20, 2010
Messages
1,409
Reaction score
1
Location
Broken Arrow
Hypothetical situation for you.

It's November 2nd, 2010. It's a cold day so you have a jacket on, concealing your sidearm. You and the wife decide to go out to eat. You get to the restaurant and since there is no "no firearms" sticker on the door, you keep your gun on you and go in. It's quite warm inside so you take your jacket off and sit down to eat. Halfway thru your meal, someone notices your pistol and complains to the management. The manager confronts you and tells you that you have to leave the establishment.

Do you,

A: pay for your partially eaten meal, put your jacket on, and quietly leave the restaurant.
B: quietly leave the restaurant without paying for your partially eaten meal.
C: Discuss the issue with the manager, explaining that since there was no signs on the doors, that you're completely within your rights to carry your pistol and refuse to leave until you've finished your meal.
D: Get up to leave but quite loudly let your feelings known about the 2nd ammendment and threaten to never eat there again.
E: Leave, but bust a cap on the complaining party on the way out. (JOKE!!!!!)



(I know this should have been a poll, but I figured it would make for good conversation until someone decides to do something meaningful with this bill)
 

Latest posts

Top Bottom