HJR1009 Alert!!

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Joined
Sep 18, 2008
Messages
3,311
Reaction score
1,116
Location
C'ville, America
Article 2 § 26. Keeping and bearing of arms – Fundamental status – Specific regulations

A. The fundamental right of each individual citizen to keep and to bear arms, including handguns, rifles, shotguns, knives, nonlethal defensive weapons and other arms in common use, as well as ammunition and the components of arms and ammunition, for security, self-defense, lawful hunting and recreation, in aid of the civil power when thereunto lawfully summoned, or for any other legitimate purpose shall not be infringed. Any regulation of this right shall be subject to strict scrutiny.

B. This section shall not prevent the Legislature from prohibiting the possession of arms by convicted felons, those adjudicated as mentally incompetent, or those who have been involuntarily committed in any mental institution.

C. No law shall impose registration, or special taxation upon the keeping of arms, including the acquisition, ownership, possession, or transfer of arms, ammunition, or the components of arms or ammunition.

Strict scrutiny would a HUGE win for us. Makes it very difficult to justify any law that intrudes upon that right, and even if the Feds eviscerate the 2A under Hillary, states always have the ability to provide citizens with greater protections, and this would do it.

I wonder if the convicts and those deemed mentally ill can petition for reinstatement on the grounds of this new bill....
ie wrongfully convicted and those with PTSD

Having PTSD is not the same thing as being adjudicated "incompetent". That requires a judge to make a finding the person is "incompetent". Being in treatment for depression, PTSD, bi-polar disorder and the like doesn't necessarily make a person "incompetent".
 

twoguns?

Sharpshooter
Special Hen
Joined
Mar 29, 2009
Messages
8,660
Reaction score
28
Location
LTown to the Lst
No, but it will/may put them on a list, that maybe a Judge will have to get them off
I would just as soon not have to have a Judge make those decisions.....but it would be nice to have something to back it up...
 

CHenry

Sharpshooter
Supporting Member
Special Hen Supporter
Joined
Feb 12, 2009
Messages
24,247
Reaction score
18,439
Location
Under your bed
Joined
Aug 16, 2012
Messages
8,007
Reaction score
6,435
Location
Shawnee, OK
Strict scrutiny would a HUGE win for us. Makes it very difficult to justify any law that intrudes upon that right, and even if the Feds eviscerate the 2A under Hillary, states always have the ability to provide citizens with greater protections, and this would do it.



Having PTSD is not the same thing as being adjudicated "incompetent". That requires a judge to make a finding the person is "incompetent". Being in treatment for depression, PTSD, bi-polar disorder and the like doesn't necessarily make a person "incompetent".
Correct you are. My sisters ex boyfriend was in the marines for a couple of years back in the 90's. He hurt his hand somehow and got partial disability. Even though he didn't need it. So he gets prescribed pain pills and he abuses the heck out of them. He is also an alcoholic. He recently told my sister that he doesn't work for tinker anymore because he is on full disability. And it's not from his hand. He claims to have PTSD even though he NEVER went to war or did anything to give him that. He puts on a big show to the doctors. He even told my sister when they were still together that he was trying to get full disability because of mental problems. Well obviously it works. And the point of this is, he had a butt load of guns. And he passes the background check every time. He is the last person who needs a gun. Much less about 50 of them.
 

tRidiot

Perpetually dissatisfied
Special Hen
Joined
Oct 23, 2009
Messages
19,521
Reaction score
12,715
Location
Bartlesville
I have seen the VA send people ridiculous amounts of pain medicine through the mail. Seens lots of old WWII and Korea and Vietnam vets who get massive amounts of the stuff, and then their family members steal it from them... it's a terrible situation. The VA is so messed up in some ways. I've seen a lot of old guys who don't want to use the VA system anymore, they'd rather utilize their Medicare and private insurance secondaries. :(
 

Gabriel42

Sharpshooter
Special Hen
Joined
Mar 6, 2013
Messages
3,134
Reaction score
74
Location
Yukon
I have seen the VA send people ridiculous amounts of pain medicine through the mail. Seens lots of old WWII and Korea and Vietnam vets who get massive amounts of the stuff, and then their family members steal it from them... it's a terrible situation. The VA is so messed up in some ways. I've seen a lot of old guys who don't want to use the VA system anymore, they'd rather utilize their Medicare and private insurance secondaries. :(

I believe they have discontinued the practice of sending Schedule 2 narcotics through the mail and those are now required to be filled at a local pharmacy.
 

Latest posts

Top Bottom