Are you sure about that.You have to be willing to do large amounts of illegal drugs to be Charlie
Oh hell yeah - I call dibs on being Charlie!
Are you sure about that.You have to be willing to do large amounts of illegal drugs to be Charlie
Oh hell yeah - I call dibs on being Charlie!
There will be greasy cheeseburgers with fried in onions, awesome steak cut fries, all the soda pops and bacon you can handle.....
AFTER you successfully complete our rehabilitation program and demonstrate that you wish to be part of the collective goodness we represent.
I think that if something changed and local PD started going door to door to collect firearms they'd have to invest a lot of money to get them.
"Knock Knock"
PD:Hi, we're here for your guns.
Citizen: Guns? What guns? I sold them all years ago.
PD: To who?
Citizen: I can't remember and I keep terrible records, I've been meaning to get better about it though. I know I really should.
PD: Can we come in and take a look?
Citizen: Do you have a warrant?
PD: Yep.
Gunfight...
I don't want another war but I feel like it is going to be the only way to keep our freedoms. The antis are being relentless to strip our rights away. They will not stop until they have succeeded. And we cannot count on our senators and reps because they are part of the problem. Our government doesn't govern anymore, they rule. And the more people that follow them the more powerful they become. The more resistance they have the harder for them to get what they want. There are too many people that think nothing will ever happen. That is exactly the attitude that will cause us to lose everything. And I agree, sometimes blood has to be shed to make things better. If something does pass do you really believe that they will stop with that? They want an outright ban of all firearms. And they will keep pushing until they get it. As long as no one resists they have no one to stop them. Is keeping our freedom joy worth the risk of bloodshed? It is to me and millions of other Americans. If we don't fight then we are pissing on our forefathers and every soldier that has fought to preserve our rights.
#1. This ain't Canada. This is the US. Do you actually believe that our government is going to admit that they are wrong?? They never have in the past. The AWB didn't reduce crime but there is no way they are Nor have said that it didn't work. They make it sound like it was a great success. And this is the problem with our government. They are to concerned with themselves to give a rats rear about us. And they dang sure Aint gonna say they are wrong. But you may be right about how our government will go about getting our guns. A registry is what they want, among other things. And that leads to confiscation. But even If Americans did resist the government would never say, "oh this isn't working like we bought it would so let's do away with it". That will never happen.Rather than a door by door search with occasional gunfire, a far more likely outcome is what happened in Canada. And I consider Canadians to be far more "pro-government" than your average Americans. (I'm married to a Canadian so I've been "involved" with them for 30 years now.) But when Canada went to a long gun registry.... surprisingly large numbers of Canadians didn't comply. Then the whole thing got super expensive. And the government was forced to admit that it wasn't working right and was being ignored by many gun owners. It was one of the factors that resulted in the Left losing control of the government and bringing the Right back.
The gov't in Canada admitted that _at best_ 50% of the long guns in Canada made it into the registry. This active refusal to comply destroyed the legitimacy of the law. Like when the national speed limit was 55 MPH but people still drove 70 and rarely got stopped.
That's what I think would happen in the US if some type of national registration actually went into law. A whole lot fewer guns would be registered than everybody thought were in the US. If 90% registered, then the people who didn't would be seen as societal outcasts and many would be prosecuted over time. But if less than 50% of the guns were registered, it would be widely seen as an unjust law and actual prosecutions would be few. Consider it to be a Ghandi or MLK type of non-violent solution. Massive non-compliance.
Gregg
Rather than a door by door search with occasional gunfire, a far more likely outcome is what happened in Canada. And I consider Canadians to be far more "pro-government" than your average Americans. (I'm married to a Canadian so I've been "involved" with them for 30 years now.) But when Canada went to a long gun registry.... surprisingly large numbers of Canadians didn't comply. Then the whole thing got super expensive. And the government was forced to admit that it wasn't working right and was being ignored by many gun owners. It was one of the factors that resulted in the Left losing control of the government and bringing the Right back.
The gov't in Canada admitted that _at best_ 50% of the long guns in Canada made it into the registry. This active refusal to comply destroyed the legitimacy of the law. Like when the national speed limit was 55 MPH but people still drove 70 and rarely got stopped.
That's what I think would happen in the US if some type of national registration actually went into law. A whole lot fewer guns would be registered than everybody thought were in the US. If 90% registered, then the people who didn't would be seen as societal outcasts and many would be prosecuted over time. But if less than 50% of the guns were registered, it would be widely seen as an unjust law and actual prosecutions would be few. Consider it to be a Ghandi or MLK type of non-violent solution. Massive non-compliance.
Gregg
Enter your email address to join: