Soviets. FTW!!!
OK, but how do the yugos match up.Mind seems very well made.My son in law
has a Chinese that I never took time to really look at but it seems to shoot
well even though the wood on the stock is not as good as mind.Just some thoughts here.
has a Chinese that I never took time to really look at but it seems to shoot
well even though the wood on the stock is not as good as mind.Just some thoughts here.
My Chinese Security Forces SKS from factory /016\ is about the smoothest shooter I've ever had:
[Broken External Image]
[Broken External Image]
The Yugos are good rifles as well, but lack of chrome lined chamber and bore takes points away especially when most of us are shooting dirty or corrosive surplus ammo. The quality of the wood usually is better on chinese than yugos in my experience, although I had a yugo with a very nice wood stock at one time.
the originals of course, the russians
they were also made by:
yugoslavia
romania
albania
china
then we have the super rare ones
north korean type 68
north vietnamese
east german
and supposedly bangladesh made sks's as well but i have never seen one
they were also made by:
yugoslavia
romania
albania
china
then we have the super rare ones
north korean type 68
north vietnamese
east german
and supposedly bangladesh made sks's as well but i have never seen one
Yugo.
1-Russian
2-Very earliest Chinese (Sino-Soviet) which were effectively Russian
2-East German which were also effectively Russian
4-Most other Chinese
4-Albanian
4-Romanian
4-Yugo
All the others are just too rare to really fit in such a listing. Actually, so is the East German.
This is an opinion based on past ownership of several of these models. You could quibble about some of the rankings, but not about No. 1.
2-Very earliest Chinese (Sino-Soviet) which were effectively Russian
2-East German which were also effectively Russian
4-Most other Chinese
4-Albanian
4-Romanian
4-Yugo
All the others are just too rare to really fit in such a listing. Actually, so is the East German.
This is an opinion based on past ownership of several of these models. You could quibble about some of the rankings, but not about No. 1.
