Oh, so now that I bring in actual scientific proxy data, instead of a cartoon, now suddenly proxy data are unreliable. So, a cartoon version of proxy data (which isn't based on any actual data) that supports your ideas is fine, actual proxy data, when it refutes your ideas, not so much.
BS .. your data looks like a cartoon too .. who says your data is correct anyway?
the only thing for sure is climate scientist cannot agree what is happening ... again ALL climate data over 150+ years old are ALL based upon interpolation of certain data points .. hell it could be CO2 contained in layers of ice or what ever. it's all speculation ..with NO one being able to say definitively this is what happened.
unless you were around say .. 20,000 years ago .. below cartoon is just someone's interpolation of data points that some scientists hope has some validity. anyone that says it's definitive is full of hucky puck!
Last edited: