Oh my....come on guys ...lets agree to disagree, ....I am late for school third grade teacher gets mad at me if late. No more political discussing here for me.
Oh my....come on guys ...lets agree to disagree, ....I am late for school third grade teacher gets mad at me if late. No more political discussing here for me.
Oh my....come on guys ...lets agree to disagree, ....I am late for school third grade teacher gets mad at me if late. No more political discussing here for me.
Given that the maximum sentence was only six months, I'm going to go with "no." But then, that inconvenient fact is probably another "liberal lie," so why bother considering it?.....I did not say he was innocent, he was found guilty. Pardoned I say the pardon was just ...for the crime, or should he have been sentenced to years hard labor ?
No. Illegal immigration is generally a civil offense, not a criminal one. We've already established that. Go back and re-read post no. 26:This country has a bad habit of not applying the rule of law blind. Untouchables sport, movie types the political class, seem to get a pass more then a guy stealing a loaf of bread. All are criminals if they break the law.
Note that the material in the quotation marks (including my boldface) is the language of the Court. One presumes the Court has at least a passing familiarity with the law...and that if not, the mistake would have been fixed on appeal....a federal judge in Phoenix entered a preliminary injunction against Arpaio and the sheriff’s office, noting that “states do not have the inherent authority to enforce the civil provisions of federal immigration law” [emphasis added]. He ordered Arpaio to stop detaining anyone not suspected of a state or federal crime — simply being in the U.S. illegally is not a crime, only a civil violation.
What about JB Books?You'll find that most here won't do that. As far as I know, not one OSA member's political views have changed due to a thread where blatant facts were posted...
You'll find that most here won't do that. As far as I know, not one OSA member's political views have changed due to a thread where blatant facts were posted.............because then the facts get debated, and source of the facts get debated..........and it goes on and on. Second verse, same as the first.........third verse, same as the first, fourth verse, same as the first. You get the idea now, welcome to OSA
What about JB Books?
What about JB Books?
Was that a confirmed team swap? If so I stand corrected
Enter your email address to join: