The mob is at fault. You still don't get it. Even speech that we might despise has to be protected for the 1st Ammendment to truly.
matter. To suggest that physical violence is a justifiable consequence to someone exercising their right to free speech is
to show your lack of understanding of what free speech is.
No, I get it just fine. I never said he didn’t have the right to make the film, but he shares part of the responsibility for what happened, as he knew damned good and well what the reaction would be. I’ve got the right to burn the flag, but I know what the reaction is going to be....and I don’t blame the crowd entirely for what they do. If you provoke a situation, you’re partly responsible – whether you have the Constitutional right to do it or not. And while physical violence isn’t a justifiable consequence, it can often be a realistic one. Again, actions have consequences.