Good on ya for that. Really.
Problem is that the SCOTUS has essentially ignored the 10th as if it didn't even exist since 1816 or so if IIRC my high school civics class (taken back in 1969 when schools still taught things like that).
There's been no reason for SCOTUS to change that stance since 1816 and getting them to change it now will take a bit more than talk. One of the downsides of appointing the suckers for life one supposes.
I agree. Yet we have to start somewhere. It's been a downhill slide for a long time. It'll be an uphill battle to restoring the Constitution. I know it won't happen in my lifetime. But by not attempting to educate those coming after us, we're essentially sealing their fate to a life much less free than we have even today. The states can force changes so long as we push back on the federal government, which has no vested interest in policing itself. Accepting that SCOTUS if the final arbiter doesn't make it true. The states/people have the final say. This was premise of the Virginia and Kentucky Resolutions. It's been used successful at other times prior to the the New Deal. And it's starting to gain steam and acceptance once again.