Politically correct too .... no bayonet lug.
Darn straight! Who needs a bayonet with the Duece?
Politically correct too .... no bayonet lug.
Yep - its important to be picky with what we call 'em because if we start calling them assault rifles, the libs get that crow-bar a little deeper into the mix because "why would anyone need a rifle that is designed to assault someone".
Look at the 94 "Assault Weapons" ban (I detest the word "Assault Weapon") - at no time in my life have I been more ashamed of politicians who were using misnomer to pass agenda-specific laws and most gun people let it happen by not correcting this bill in its early stages since the word "Assault Weapon" was a made-up term.
I don't even mind mags/clips anymore, but I correct gun people (and non-gun people) all the time when they use the word "Assault Rifle" to describe a semi-auto sporting rifle.
That being said, I like the AR-15 (as I probably won't ever save up for a Pre-86 full-auto conversion or M16), but I'd love to own a semi-auto FAL as well.
My Henry pump .22Lr. I try to use it to assault as many people as possible.
M14 with Smith Enterprise muzzle brake, this I really do want:
http://www.smithenterprise.com/misc/uscg_mb01.html
That, looks effective. If I could actually afford an M-14 and the ammo to feed it, that might make me reconsider one.
I use an AR for asalt and the 870 for apepper.
although i don't own one i would take the MSAR E4. short overall without the $200 stamp, takes ar mags, shoots relativly cheap 5.56.
as far as what i own my m1a takes the cake over the AR although its heavy. my mind might change on this when im done building my sidecharging ar, but i doubt it...
Enter your email address to join: