Mutually Exclusive red herrings flying all over the joint.....
Lets turn the corner a little here folks. I understand the military necessity for the use of fully auto weapons under certain circumstances in a conflict which is exactly as lurker described it. To wit: suppressive fire and movement under fire. With that in mind what are the circumstances our LEO members foresee that would require the effective and responsible use of full auto weapons?
My question still stands.
Really what's the big deal with FA? Seems to me that accurate semi-auto fire is more effective 99% of the time than spray and pray FA fire. IDK. I'm not a soldier nor have I been. Just seems like a waste of ammo.
Here's the problem with that thought. We have been at war for 10 plus years. Pumping millions of service members in and out. The average Leo now comes across more better trained people than they ever have. Watched a video where one man with an ak killed 5 officers by having better tactics. The gunman waited for the police to take cover behind their vehicles and he used fire superiority to keep them ducked as he walked right up to each responding car and gunned them down. Police have a legitimate need nowadays for better firepower and military training.it still stands because the local police have no business using military tactics against civilians. Thats another agencies job. Even N Hollywood was handled without FA weapons and military tactics.
With that said, i do think some cities need particular teams for certain situations. If the citizens of Ada approve, im cool with that.
Enter your email address to join: