True, fact would be the verdict. Now let's say the verdict came out the other way... Would you protest for his exoneration?
I wouldn't. I'd add him to the list with Kenneth Gumm and Jerome Ersland.
True, fact would be the verdict. Now let's say the verdict came out the other way... Would you protest for his exoneration?
None of what I said was opinion. If I had gone into my opinion I would have talked about how Trayvon was Likely hopped up on cough syrup, and had a history of illegal and illicit behavior, and how it was quite likely that this little thug assaulted someone, and paid the price for his crime. But I didn't say any of that. Instead I dealt strictly with facts. Indisputable facts.
all sorts of evidence released to public domain for each person to listen to and form their own opinion.
just like you I've got an opinion and it happens to be different from yours....
judging from the MASS protest going on around the country ... there's a good chance there's other folks out there that also disagree with your opinion.
...That's fine and dandy but I put a little more credibility into the sequestered jury that had access to all the information and it's relation to one another and found Zman not guilty of even the lesser charge of manslaughter.
you are forgetting one minor detail ... what's "facts" to you may not be the same for someone else.Having differing opinions is one thing. People seem to be changing the facts to fit their narrative. You are entitled to your own opinion but NOT your own facts.
Then there was the GF in his ear with "the man-boy rapist" idea, disaster waitin to happen.
Only if he hadnt gone to the store for the ingredents for that illicit drug, he would probably be doin fine today
If he had not decided to cut through a gated community he would be fine today. Most people move into one because they are at least a little afraid of buglers, home invasion, etc.
Facts are facts. They don't change. Sorry that you can understand stand that.you are forgetting one minor detail ... what's "facts" to you may not be the same for someone else.
Wow, few people went full retard in this thread, never go full retard. It's honestly sad to see the fools trying to argue the facts which came out in the trial. Those are the recognized facts in the court of law, those were the facts which came out during the trial & those were the facts used to determine the verdict. PERIOD. To sit here & try to debate those facts is pointless & some of those debating are totally ignoring the evidence which was brought fourth & are still going off the INCORRECT information the media fed them.
This trial did nothing more than it was intended to do, drive a huge wedge into the population. divided we fall together we stand people. If you cannot see what our government is doing & the reasons they got involved you are truly lost. We have been put against each other to further an agenda, there is NO other logical reason for Obama & Holder to still be fanning the flames. Make no mistake, this is part of a bigger plan.
Enter your email address to join: