So I have an odd question. I know buying as a gift is legal, but does the source of the money to buy as a gift matter?
My situation is this: It is my Father's birthday coming up and we were talking about what we wanted to get him, and we decided a new .22 might not be a bad option, since right now all he has is an Apache 66.
So, if we all split the cost and I go purchase the firearm for him as a gift and they reimburse me for their portions of the cost, am I still the purchaser? I'm pretty sure I am, but me and a coworker have been arguing the semantics of what would be considered a straw purchase in this situation, and I would like to see some other opinions on the situation.
What would be the difference between that, and someone giving me money to buy a firearm for myself?
Thanks
My situation is this: It is my Father's birthday coming up and we were talking about what we wanted to get him, and we decided a new .22 might not be a bad option, since right now all he has is an Apache 66.
So, if we all split the cost and I go purchase the firearm for him as a gift and they reimburse me for their portions of the cost, am I still the purchaser? I'm pretty sure I am, but me and a coworker have been arguing the semantics of what would be considered a straw purchase in this situation, and I would like to see some other opinions on the situation.
What would be the difference between that, and someone giving me money to buy a firearm for myself?
Thanks