Congress blocks military orders that restrict gun rights

[mons meg]

Just posted to Arms and the Law:

Congress blocks military orders that restrict gun rights
Posted by David Hardy · 9 March 2011 10:52 AM

This is aimed at base commanders who have ordered that soldiers report and register privately-owned firearms kept at their residences off-based.

The Public Law version is not yet online, but here's a link to the 2011 National Defense Authorization Act as introduced, which became Pub. L. 111-383. Section 1062 (on PDF pages 253-54) provides:

"SEC. 1062. PROHIBITION ON INFRINGING ON THE INDIVIDUAL RIGHT TO LAWFULLY ACQUIRE, POSSESS, OWN, CARRY, AND OTHERWISE USE PRIVATELY OWNED FIREARMS, AMMUNITION, AND OTHER WEAPONS.

(a) In General- Except as provided in subsection (c), the Secretary of Defense shall not prohibit, issue any requirement relating to, or collect or record any information relating to the otherwise lawful acquisition, possession, ownership, carrying, or other use of a privately owned firearm, privately owned ammunition, or another privately owned weapon by a member of the Armed Forces or civilian employee of the Department of Defense on property that is not--
(1) a military installation; or
(2) any other property that is owned or operated by the Department of Defense.
(b) Existing Regulations and Records-

(1) REGULATIONS- Any regulation promulgated before the date of enactment of this Act shall have no force or effect to the extent that it requires conduct prohibited by this section.

(2) RECORDS- Not later than 90 days after the date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall destroy any record containing information described in subsection (a) that was collected before the date of enactment of this Act.

(c) Rule of Construction- Subsection (a) shall not be construed to limit the authority of the Secretary of Defense to--
(1) create or maintain records relating to, or regulate the possession, carrying, or other use of a firearm, ammunition, or other weapon by a member of the Armed Forces or civilian employee of the Department of Defense while--
(A) engaged in official duties on behalf of the Department of Defense; or
(B) wearing the uniform of an Armed Force; or
(2) create or maintain records relating to an investigation, prosecution, or adjudication of an alleged violation of law (including regulations not prohibited under subsection (a)), including matters related to whether a member of the Armed Forces constitutes a threat to the member or others.

(d) Review- Not later than 180 days after the date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall--
(1) conduct a comprehensive review of the privately owned weapons policy of the Department of Defense, including legal and policy issues regarding the regulation of privately owned firearms off of a military installation, as recommended by the Department of Defense Independent Review Related to Fort Hood; and
(2) submit to the Committee on Armed Services of the Senate and the Committee on Armed Services of the House of Representatives a report regarding the findings of and recommendations relating to the review conducted under paragraph (1), including any recommendations for adjustments to the requirements under this section.

(e) Military Installation Defined- In this section, the term `military installation' has the meaning given that term under section 2687(e)(1) of title 10, United States Code. "

http://armsandthelaw.com/archives/2011/03/congress_blocks.php

Link to Public law: http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/CPRT-111HPRT63160/pdf/CPRT-111HPRT63160.pdf

 

[SMS]

Passed and signed by the President? Good news if so...

 

[Harley1953]

Boy that is some good news for our service members.

 

[TJay74]

So this means now they can carry and bring the weapon onto the base or no?

 

[HiPower]

So this means now they can carry and bring the weapon onto the base or no?

Absolutely not. Did you bother to read it?

 

[Glocktogo]

Very good news!

 

[Gunrunner45]

So this means now they can carry and bring the weapon onto the base or no?

No.

Base Commanders were requiring service members to report all firearms they owned regardless of where they were kept, on or off base.

This law abolishes that practice and forces them to destroy any records they collected.

 

[FireproofD3:25]

Extremely happy to see this!

 

[Shifty]

Great to hear. Having to register my guns with post made me really nervous when I heard stories of guys having their stuff confiscated because they had been diagnosed with PTSD. Not to mention, I just dont think its anyones business wether or not I own a gun.

 

[Bierhunter]

Glad to see this getting fixed (hopefully).

that practice must of started after I got out, or I just didn't know about it. As long as I kept my guns off base nobody knew about them.