Actually society does agree, this is the law!, It is I have no liability at all for this. It is not my responsibility to prove someone is not a felon before selling them a weapon! The law does not require I do this.
As long as you sell it privately within the prescribed laws and you did not knowingly sell it to a felon you have nothing to worry about....no paper work needed. Please cite a case where someone who sold a gun privately within the laws got into trouble. I could cite several cases where a gun was sold privately (no paperwork) and then used in crime and there was no problems for the seller.
Just a question. Should not an estate sale go through a FFL holder? It seems that all of the drawings that I have entered to win guns went through an FFL.
How is a drawing/raffle like an estate sale?
Go read the Tulsa World article from a couple of days ago on the route taken by the Glock involved in the killing of those girls in Weleetka. The article was about the preliminary hearing and they even brought in a Glock rep from GA to start the chain.
The question becomes about the final transaction from a reserve police officer to the accused killer when the perp was working at a McD's drive-thru window. I'm not saying anything was done wrong or illegally but I suspect the transaction may be given a close eye yet.
This is correct, I have no obligation to prove that the person I am selling to does not have a previous felony conviction.
Personally, i think the idea that a felon cannot own a firearms is ridiculous, if they have served their time they are freemen, and freemen have all natural rights as everybody else! Never mind that the majority of "felons" are not for violent offenses.
Now regardless of what I think of that, the way the law is written today is that I can not knowingly sell to a felon. But I have no obligation to prove they are not!
Enter your email address to join: