Mayor supports plan to limit marijuana arrests

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
C

Clay

Guest
Glad to see this happening in more places. I dont smoke but I think this war on drugs needs to end.

http://www.nytimes.com/2012/06/05/n...o-change-marijuana-arrest-policy.html?_r=1&hp

ALBANY - The New York Police Department, the mayor and the city’s top prosecutors on Monday endorsed a proposal to decriminalize the open possession of small amounts of marijuana, giving an unexpected lift to an effort by Gov. Andrew M. Cuomo to cut down on the number of people arrested as a result of police stops.
Connect with NYTMetro
Metro Twitter Logo.

Follow us on Twitter and like us on Facebook for news and conversation.
Readers’ Comments

Share your thoughts.

Post a Comment »
Read All Comments (689) »

Mayor Michael R. Bloomberg, whose Police Department made about 50,000 arrests last year for low-level marijuana possession, said the governor’s proposal “strikes the right balance” in part because it would still allow the police to arrest people who smoke marijuana in public.

The marijuana arrests are a byproduct of the Police Department’s increasingly controversial stop-and-frisk practice. Mr. Bloomberg and police officials say the practice has made the city safer, but, because most of those stopped are black or Hispanic, the practice has been criticized as racially biased by advocates for minority communities.

The support expressed by Mr. Bloomberg, prosecutors and police officials is likely to carry significant weight in the Republican-led State Senate, which is the key obstacle to passage of the bill in Albany during this year’s legislative session. Mr. Cuomo has amassed a strong track record of winning passage of legislation he embraces, and the speaker of the Assembly, Sheldon Silver, joined him at his news conference Monday, indicating that the Democrat-controlled Assembly would back the measure. The Republican Senate leadership has traditionally opposed legislation it views as soft on criminals.

Mr. Cuomo, a Democrat, framed the issue as one of racial justice as well as common sense, saying that the police in New York City were wasting time, resources and good will making tens of thousands of unnecessary arrests. Possession of small amounts of marijuana is a crime only if the marijuana is in public view or if it is being smoked in public, but many of the marijuana possession arrests have been occurring when the police order someone stopped to empty his or her pockets, making the marijuana visible - a phenomenon the governor called an “aggravated complication” of the stop-and-frisk practice.

“It becomes a question of balance,” the governor said of the city’s police stops. “Part of the balance is the relationship with the community. I think the N.Y.P.D. and the mayor are making efforts to work with the community.”

The governor’s announcement was cheered by lawmakers from minority neighborhoods as well as by civil rights groups, who are increasingly looking to Albany and to Washington in an effort to rein in what they see as overly aggressive tactics on the part of the Bloomberg administration.

Black leaders also cited the governor’s proposal as a rare recognition of - and attempt to remedy - what they describe as a cultural and legal double standard: that young African-American men are being arrested in large numbers for an activity - using marijuana - that is prevalent, but with less frequent legal consequences, among whites of the same age.

“Some of our police officers are making race-based discretionary decisions on who they’re going to arrest for low-level marijuana possession,” said Leroy Gadsden, the president of a branch of the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People in Jamaica, Queens, and the chairman of the criminal justice committee for the statewide N.A.A.C.P. “Therefore, of course, if you’re a young, black male, even a female, you’re going to feel that you’re being targeted when you notice that your white counterparts are not being arrested for the same thing.”

The Rev. Al Sharpton praised Mr. Cuomo’s proposal as “a step in the right direction” in curbing what he described as racial profiling by the Police Department. And Assemblyman Hakeem Jeffries, a Brooklyn Democrat who has pushed legislation to end low-level marijuana arrests, said, “It cannot be criminal behavior for one group of people and socially acceptable behavior for another group of people, where the dividing line is race.”

A spokesman for Mr. Bloomberg rejected the notion that the Police Department acted with racial bias in arresting people for marijuana possession.

Under Mr. Cuomo’s proposal, the state would downgrade the possession of 25 grams or less of marijuana in public view from a misdemeanor to a violation, with a maximum fine of $100 for first-time drug offenders. It is already a violation to possess that amount without putting it into public view.
In September, facing growing pressure over the marijuana arrests, Police Commissioner Raymond W. Kelly issued a memorandum clarifying that the police were not to arrest people who take small amounts of marijuana out of their pockets after being stopped. A city spokesman said that low-level marijuana arrests had fallen by nearly a quarter since then.
Connect with NYTMetro
Metro Twitter Logo.

Follow us on Twitter and like us on Facebook for news and conversation.
Readers’ Comments

Share your thoughts.

Post a Comment »
Read All Comments (689) »

Mr. Bloomberg, whose administration had previously defended low-level marijuana arrests as a means of deterring more serious crimes, said on Monday that Mr. Cuomo’s proposal was consistent with Mr. Kelly’s directive. Mr. Kelly made a rare trip to the Capitol to join Mr. Cuomo at the news conference as a way of demonstrating the city’s support for the governor’s proposal.

“This law will make certain that the confusion in this situation will be eliminated,” Mr. Kelly said, adding, “Quite frankly, it will make the application of this law much clearer.”

Mr. Cuomo said changing the law was a better approach in the long term, saying, “I think it puts the police in an awkward position to tell them, enforce some laws, don’t enforce other laws.”

“This is nice and clean: change the law, period,” the governor added.

The five district attorneys in New York City also endorsed the change in the law on Monday. The Manhattan district attorney, Cyrus R. Vance Jr., said that half of the 6,200 people who were charged with low-level marijuana possession last year in Manhattan had never been arrested before.

“This simple and fair change will help us redirect significant resources to the most serious criminals and crime problems,” Mr. Vance said. “And, frankly, it’s the right thing to do.”

But one Republican, Senator Martin J. Golden of Brooklyn, expressed concerns. He said that the enthusiasm among some lawmakers and advocacy groups for Mr. Cuomo’s proposal was “all about stop-and-frisk,” and, citing several young people in his district who had died of prescription drug overdoses in recent months, questioned the message it would send to young people about drug use.

Noting the 25-gram threshold for Mr. Cuomo’s proposal, he said, “That’s a lot of pot, my friend.”
 

okiebryan

Sharpshooter
Special Hen
Joined
Aug 14, 2012
Messages
1,342
Reaction score
1
Location
OKC
Legalize and tax. End the cartel stranglehold on Mexico, raise all kinds of revenue for the pols to spend. It's a damn plant that was made illegal for racist reasons in the first place back in 1936. Focus on meth production, that way the cops still get to keep their little "war" on drugs and all the paramilitary toys and money.
 
D

Doc Holiday

Guest
Sometimes I think the whole "war on this, and war on that" silliness is all we can come up with to keep ourselves focused, when in reality the greatest enemy we face as a population living in the most powerful nation in the world is eating ourselves to death.

Blooomberg should have called it a "War on corn syrup," then maybe it would have struck a cord. Not that agree with that, but I don't really agree with any declarations of an obscurely defined war on something either. Is marijuana a serious drug threat? Are vandals and protesters deserving of the title of terrorists? Slippery slopes that we could do without starting in the first place.
 

HMFIC

Sharpshooter
Special Hen
Joined
May 4, 2009
Messages
11,193
Reaction score
11
Location
Tulsa
HA! You can't make this stuff up.

So first Bloomin'Berg bans large sody-pops and before you can say boo, he legalizes maryjane.
 
Last edited:

henschman

Sharpshooter
Special Hen
Joined
Jul 22, 2008
Messages
4,396
Reaction score
24
Location
Oklahoma City
It is what I would call a very small step in the right direction. Might as well enjoy it... we get very few steps in that direction these days.

okiebryan, the only thing better than legalizing and taxing it is legalizing and NOT taxing it. The same goes for every other victimless crime.
 
C

Clay

Guest
The legalization of pot has been building steam slowely for several years (not sure how long) but we have CA and NY thumbing their noses at the Federal Pot laws so it can be done.
 

vvvvvvv

Sharpshooter
Special Hen
Joined
Nov 18, 2008
Messages
12,284
Reaction score
65
Location
Nowhere
Focus on meth production

Why? Local production accounts for a very small fraction of the source of meth. Meth is also available by prescription (recommended by the FDA to treat "ADD" in children with no dosage limit, and obesity in adults). The pseudoephedrine legislation has its roots in lobbying from the largest manufacturer of phenylephrine with the goal of legally eliminating competition and boosting sales.
 
C

Clay

Guest
A 2008 study by Harvard economist Jeffrey A. Miron has estimated that legalizing drugs would inject $76.8 billion a year into the U.S. economy - $44.1 billion from law enforcement savings, and at least $32.7 billion in tax revenue ($6.7 billion from marijuana, $22.5 billion from cocaine and heroin, remainder from other drugs).

During the early-to-mid-1990s, the Clinton administration ordered and funded a major cocaine policy study, again by RAND. The Rand Drug Policy Research Center study concluded that $3 billion should be switched from federal and local law enforcement to treatment. The report said that treatment is the cheapest way to cut drug use, stating that drug treatment is twenty-three times more effective than the supply-side "war on drugs".
 

vvvvvvv

Sharpshooter
Special Hen
Joined
Nov 18, 2008
Messages
12,284
Reaction score
65
Location
Nowhere
$44.1 billion from law enforcement savings

Except they don't want the savings.

"DRUGS ARE FLOODING THE STREETS! WE NEED MORE FUNDING TO STOP IT!"
"OUR STREETS ARE DRUG FREE! WE NEED MORE FUNDING TO EXPAND/IMPROVE THE PROGRAM!"

Personally, I'd be willing to accept the same type of regulation we have for tobacco re: private cultivation, although I personally believe that government has no authority to "regulate" a plant.
 

Latest posts

Top Bottom